| You have hit upon a critically important point
If society breaks down the medical system breaks down. The diseases
you mention and others will begin to appear and take a horrific toll on the survivors. For survival purposes we will need to revert to the thinking of the middle ages when girls sixteen years of age (age at which it was considered best to start having children) will need to produce a large number of children to offset the death loss from diseases and the stillborn factor. Naturally, a large number of mothers will die in childbirth.
So, here comes the big question. Who is better off? The people who die in the initial breakdown of society or the survivors? Will this be a case wherein the suvivors curse the already dead? It very possibly could be this situation.
Lockjaw was more fatal in WW1 than your current statiscal
rate. But perhaps the lack of sanitation, food quality, water quality,
stress from combat and so on weakened the body thus making it
quite often a three day slide to death.
|