Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-08-2008, 01:47 PM   #21
Firearm Zealot
 
Rave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Tampa,Florida.
Posts: 10,800
Wink

OK,I'll settle down,whew,I done worked myself up in to a lather!
__________________
USAF 62-66 E-4
Resident Curmudgeon
We have been and still are being sold out.
Rave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2008, 05:58 PM   #22
Retired Moderator
 
BattleRifleG3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Western PA
Posts: 11,751
GWB leaned towards military involvement in the middle east, as connected with the events of Sept 11, 2001. He leaned away from involvement with N Korea, and that situation has stabilized slightly.

BO leans towards interventions in the Sudan. He favors expanding the Afghan conflict at the expense of the Iraq conflict. He also has repeatedly warned of the possibility of involvement in Pakistan.

What I think is going to happen is that BO will force himself to commit in many more theatres, but won't be able to scale down Iraq as he had planned. And I think BO will ultimately become the most militaristic president since the cold war for it, reinstituting the draft and possibly even using the bomb. He will end up burning even more bridges with the rest of the world, making more enemies and no new friends. At least GW bush made new friends despite ticking off a couple long term allies.

If only Iraq hadn't been about finding WMDs. If only it was about removing a tyrant who we had befriended, only to have him betray us, just as Osama Bin Laden had. Or if Saddam's posession of WMDs was seen as a doctrine, not a theory to prove. I think he had them and just sent them accross the border. Saddam Hussein was the WMD, and that should have been good enough. If we had just insisted it was good enough, I think we would have been in better shape.
__________________
Trust is earned, not... GIVEN away. - Worf
BattleRifleG3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2008, 11:57 PM   #23
Firearm Aficionado
 
Enscribe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 533
Quote:       Originally Posted by TexasT View Post
^ROFL I think you definitely have it here! One of the funnier responses I've seen in context.

I think we all feel like something is coming. Wait for it....or don't. I'm ready for anything or ready to live my life and die before anything ever happens.
__________________
Gun Control: A sharp eye and a steady finger
Enscribe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2008, 01:54 AM   #24
Firearm Zealot
 
Capt'n Mil Coll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Right behind you. -NRA Member-
Posts: 5,494
Blog Entries: 1
Yes WWIII has started. It started on a Gun forum over a posting about WWWIII I believe.
__________________
It is foolish and wrong to mourn the men who died. Rather we should thank God that such men lived.
Capt'n Mil Coll is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2008, 08:37 AM   #25
Firearm Enthusiast
 
Broadside's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Coatesville, PA
Posts: 65
CWT, getting back to the original post....

I also think we're starting to circle the drain as far as the current status quo goes, and although none of us can predict the future we can pay attention to what the powers that be say when they think we're not listening. Such as....

Quote:      
"Today, America would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order. Tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told that there were an outside threat from beyond, whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will plead to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well-being granted to them by the World Government."
Dr. Henry Kissinger, Bilderberger Conference, Evians, France, 1991
and...

Quote:      
"A total world population of 250-300 million people, a 95% decline from present levels, would be ideal."
Ted Turner, in an interview with Audubon magazine.
and...

Quote:      
"The truth of the matter is that you do have those standby provisions, and the statutory emergency plans are there whereby you could, in the name of stopping terrorism, apprehend, invoke the military, and arrest Americans and hold them in detention camps."
-- U.S. Representative Henry Gonzalez, August 29, 1994.
and finally...


Quote:      
"We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries."
David Rockefeller, Baden-Baden, Germany 1991
So my answer is... No you're not just being paranoid. You're simply paying more attention than the average guy.
Broadside is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2008, 08:54 AM   #26
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: SE IDAHO
Posts: 4,920
"...you're not just being paranoid. You're simply paying more attention than the average guy."

Bingo...

...thanks!
LiveToShoot is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Gun & Game - The Friendliest Gun Forum on the Internet > General > The Powder Keg

Tags
war, world, wwiii

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:53 PM.




Recent Discussions

Connect with us!
Advertisement



"It don't cost nuthin' to be nice." -- Mike West