Old 01-22-2009, 01:48 PM   #1
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Al
Posts: 1
Question What Scope to use

I am looking at a Remington VTR in .308 and need to get a scope. Leupold, Nikon, Zeiss. All clam to get the best light transfer and all that. I am looking around the 2.5/3.5 to 9/12 power and think I would like at least 50mm. I am not sure if the 30mm tube is better or not. I just would like any advice. Price range is up to a VX-7, around $700 to $1600.

O it is to hunt, Deer, Coyote, Hog.

Thanks
Tim
twill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2009, 01:55 PM   #2
Firearm Aficionado
 
Rimjob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: searching for Atlantis
Posts: 1,052
Welcome to the site Twill!!
I hope you'll hang out for a while!
We need more BAMA boys 'round here!

Hell I say if you can afford that VX-7 then I'd stick with that. Every single Leupold I've ever owned was well worth the money!
Some may argue that you'd be better of w/ a Nightforce and get a little more zoom for the same amount of $$$..
NightForce 5.5 - 22x56 NXS Illuminated Reticle Riflescopes w/ FREE UPS. Available in Zero Stop, Mil-Radian, & Zero-Stop Mil-Radian 5.5-22x 56mm Night Force NXS Scopes DISCOUNT 5.5-22x 56 NXS NightForce Zero Stop NXS2256-NP-1RR NXS2256-NP-1 NXS2256-NP
Rimjob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2009, 02:24 PM   #3
(Tom)
 
FortyXDM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Gladstone, Mo. (kc area)
Posts: 6,632
Twill - Welcome to the site. You will have no trouble at all getting opinions. There are a lot of folks here that have forgotten more about this stuff than many of us remember.
Personally I think that much of the light gathering hoopla is just that.
I do know something about optics, being a photographer for 30 years. The thing is, in order to benefit from the twilight capability of the larger 50, it must be used in the twilight to be of benefit. If it is morning....wait 15 minutes and you won't be able to tell the difference looking through a 50 versus a 40 mm objective. Try them side by side in both weak and bright light. In some northern latitudes (upper Sask, Finland, etc.) you could be in a low light situation all day. Then they would be of benefit.
For Bama huntin....no so much. Further, you add extra cost, extra weight, and have an awkward looking rifle. Quite a price for 15 minutes.
If it is twilight/dusk.....well, don't shoot.....go back to camp/cabin/home, and have a whiskey. A 30 mm (1 in) scope is a bit stronger, but again, marginally so and not as elegant on the rifle. Nice though, if you must have a 50. I also agree with Rimjob....I have used Leupolds for years (and others) and trust them. I know there may be someone who might jump on me with both feet about poo pooing the 50, but try to get both for a day of your own testing (don't have to be mounted) and see what you thinks best for you. A lot of the popularity in the larger scopes comes from their widespread use in the sniping application, which I consider a whole new ballgame. Again, Welcome to G&G.
Tom
FortyXDM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2009, 06:14 PM   #4
Firearm Zealot
 
big shrek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Northwest, FL
Posts: 6,573
Blog Entries: 1
Check out the commentary in the OPTICS section...you'll find dozens of good scopes, and a few great ones in your range
__________________
Marlin & Calico Specialist
I'm not just Trigger Happy, I'm Trigger Ecstatic!!
big shrek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2009, 07:29 PM   #5
Firearm Enthusiast
 
Ahshucks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Oregon, WI
Posts: 12
I still like my leupolds, but reading some of the sour reviews of how their scopes haven't approved, other than a few tweaks, while they brand them as new and stick you with a high price. Isn't it true? Look at their branding.

We read many comments in the forums about buying good glass and it should cost as much as your gun. I suppose this might be necessary if I had the job of shooting the flies off of cattle at 500 yards. About the only improvement I've seen that's worth the money is the new ranging scopes and they are $300-$400 a pound. Sorry but I want light gear.

If you're going to be hunting deer, hog, and coyote you don't need $1000+ glass. You would find a ballistic recticle handy. If you're doing your hunting in wooded areas a 2-7x35 or 40 is light on your gun. If you're hunting in the open prairie, desert the 4-12/14x40 lets you dial in a good target but takes away some of your fast close in activity.

I almost bought another leupold this week to put on my new Browning BLR in 308, but got a tip about a scope a guy put on his son's gun and his son loves it. Googled the company and found their headquarters are within 20 miles of me, so I went to do some comparison shopping. These scopes are clear, bright, and have fine dots on their ballistic recticle for hold over and wind/running shots. I was impressed so walked out with a 2-7x35 Diamondback including see through scope covers, a shirt, and a orange hat for $189 including the governor's portion.

Vortex Optics - Home
Ahshucks is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Gun & Game - The Friendliest Gun Forum on the Internet > General > The Powder Keg

Tags
scope, scopes

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:16 AM.




Recent Discussions

Connect with us!
Advertisement



"It don't cost nuthin' to be nice." -- Mike West