Old 02-17-2009, 09:59 PM   #1
Mil-surp Collector
 
jason1965's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Bennington NewHampshire
Posts: 1,715
whole bunch of guns

Police recover second weapons cache in Central Mass.

The guy who had the guns,used to be a licensed gun dealer,10 years ago.
Kinda scary news don't you think?
jason1965 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2009, 10:13 PM   #2
Firearm Enthusiast
 
Savage7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 239
So they went into his house going on someone elses accusitions, arrested him, and took all of his guns.

how i see it is they broke into his house and stole his guns.

i consider 85 guns a great collection, and personally know a guy who has around that many. He is a extremely responsible gun owner.
Savage7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2009, 10:16 PM   #3
Firearm Enthusiast
 
Mando's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Kalifornia
Posts: 154
[sarcasm]It's a wonder the man didn't go crazy and start blowing the town up.[/sarcasm]
Maybe he just liked lots of stuff that can blow up. I don't think a 72 year old would be a threat to society, he probably had the stuff for a while. And since when is ammunition worthy of seizure?
Mando is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2009, 10:37 PM   #4
Firearm Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Southeast Arkansas
Posts: 100
If we are not careful this will be the way it is all over the country. It will start by the gov. telling us that we can only own so many guns and before long we will be told that we can't have any.
nighthawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2009, 11:28 PM   #5
Firearm Enthusiast
 
SteelHere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: SE Kansas
Posts: 140
are you telling me that the government can tell me how to store my own guns in MY house? how can they charge him with "improper storage", i understand that it is common sense to have trigger locks, a gun safe, etc. but in his case maybe he didnt see a need for protection, or maybe he had a lock on cellar door so grandkids" couldnt go down there, who knows but i think this is unlawful search and seizure, they should have retreived his stolen property and returned it to him, who cares that a police chief asked for him to turn over his weapons, he was not convicted that i found of a felony which makes it legal for him to own firearems

of and a more detailed story is here:
Worcester Telegram & Gazette News
__________________
Like I said, the people have spoken

But the people are stupid. - gandog56
SteelHere is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2009, 11:52 PM   #6
Resident Curmudgeon
 
Cyrano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: New York
Posts: 15,339
This seems a little extreme, even for the Peoples Democratic Republic of Massachusetts. The article is very much less than informative. On what grounds did the Gestapo raid a private citizen's home and seize this man's firearms and ammo, which they turned over to the BATFE? (And I'd like to know why the Auburn Police Department turned the guns over to BATFE. Aren't they evidence in the case they presumably want to build against Simulynas?)

A little Internet searching turned up more information on this incident. Anthony Simulynas apparently used to have a Class 1 FFL, which was revoked in 1999 during the Clintonistas' vendetta against gun dealers who worked out of their homes. The raid apparently was based on information laid by one Paul Mateiko, who was discovered to have about 101 firearms and a whole lot of ammo, including an MG-34 he stole from Simulynas.

The real issue in the Simulynas case seems to be that Simulynas did not have 82 of the 85 guns he owned "properly stored," which reading the articles and reading between the lines of same seems to be the real issue the Massachusetts Antigun Gestapo have with the man. According the Massachusetts General Laws, Chapter 140, Section 131L (a),

"It shall be unlawful to store or keep any firearm, rifle or shotgun including, but not limited to, large capacity weapons, or machine gun in any place unless such weapon is secured in a locked container or equipped with a tamper-resistant mechanical lock or other safety device, properly engaged so as to render such weapon inoperable by any person other than the owner or other lawfully authorized user. For purposes of this section, such weapon shall not be deemed stored or kept if carried by or under the control of the owner or other lawfully authorized user."

Only three of the 85 guns seized were locked in a case. The rest were either out in the open or not equipped with trigger locks as decreed by Massachusetts law.

It should be noted that what started the ball rolling was the fire department responding to a medical emergency at Mateiko's home earlier this month. The firemen noticed he had a whole lot of guns laying around and informed the police, who subsequently raided Mateiko's house. When they questioned him as to where he got the MG-34, he told them he'd stolen it from Simulynas. That, so it would seem, was sufficient for the Auburn Police Department to go before a judge and obtain a search warrant for Simulynas's home. The fact it was stolen seems to be beside the point.

And to think I thought the gun laws in New York outside New York City were unreasonable. Compared to Massachusetts, New York is a state of sweetness and light and friendly toward gun owners!
Cyrano is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Gun & Game - The Friendliest Gun Forum on the Internet > General > The Powder Keg

Tags
bunch, guns

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:45 AM.




Recent Discussions

Connect with us!
Advertisement



"It don't cost nuthin' to be nice." -- Mike West