Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-19-2009, 03:38 PM   #1
Firearm Aficionado
 
roadie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 1,421
Modified custom machined 91/30 sniper

Just came across this vid of a guy who machined a new receiver for his 91/30 sniper, not to bad of a job, though the camera guy sucks. He has other vids of it on his youtube page.

__________________
Blaming guns for violent acts is like blaming the keyboard for your poor spelling.
roadie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2009, 03:53 PM   #2
Firearm Aficionado
 
Whootsinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,080
I'll leave mine the way it is, thank you...
Whootsinator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2009, 05:10 PM   #3
Firearm Zealot
 
gandog56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Mobile, Alabama
Posts: 18,975
Twice he says this is for the purist. A purist would not even dare to desecrate a Mosin like that!
__________________
People think I'm paranoid because I own guns. If I own guns, what do I have to be paranoid about?
gandog56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-2009, 05:13 PM   #4
Firearm Aficionado
 
Whootsinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,080
I think he meant his M44 was for the purists, proving he had an M44 that he left alone.
Whootsinator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2009, 03:06 AM   #5
Firearm Enthusiast
 
AMD4400's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Washington
Posts: 74
I wish Remington would just make a model 700 chambered for the 7.62x54r so that these poor old relics not get the hack saw treatment. Better yet have some company reproduce the Mosin Nagant with enhancements "chromed lined barrel, improved trigger, ect".
AMD4400 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2009, 07:17 AM   #6
Firearm Enthusiast
 
bigb831's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: wisconsin
Posts: 220
i would think the m4 stock would break when shooting 7.62x54r. is it legal to remove the serial # on the bolt?
bigb831 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2009, 08:52 AM   #7
Some People's kids....
 
texnmidwest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: South east Wisconsin
Posts: 12,163
I would ask the BATF before removing any numbers but the way I understand it the only number that is important is the serial number on the receiver. With out the receiver a bolt is just a piece of fashioned steel. The receiver is considered the firearm.
__________________
Dedicated to SwedeSteve, Arkansashunter and Ezearln. Rest in peace my friends.
texnmidwest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2009, 10:12 AM   #8
Firearm Aficionado
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Texas, USSA
Posts: 1,391
Horrible Horrible Horrible.
tmanbuckhunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2009, 12:03 PM   #9
Firearm Enthusiast
 
I STALIN I's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Elk Grove, CA
Posts: 228
Quote:       Originally Posted by AMD4400 View Post
I wish Remington would just make a model 700 chambered for the 7.62x54r so that these poor old relics not get the hack saw treatment. Better yet have some company reproduce the Mosin Nagant with enhancements "chromed lined barrel, improved trigger, ect".
I would buy a model 700 or a ruger or something chambered in 7.62x54r...but I would never own a illegal / retarded mosin nagant.
I STALIN I is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2009, 12:18 PM   #10
Firearm Zealot
 
Iron_Colonel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Washington St.
Posts: 4,777
And it was a 1928 he ruined. Could have been a 1942 or 1943 Izzy..... the most plentiful 91/30.
__________________
Mosin Nagant evangelist on a mission to convert YOU!
Iron_Colonel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2009, 12:47 PM   #11
Firearm Aficionado
 
Whootsinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,080
The original serial number that was assigned to the rifle at the factory in Izhevsk, Tula, or the other two that I can never remember how to spell correctly, does not matter one single bit to the BATF, the serial number they care about is the serial that is now required to be assigned by the importer on their giant billboards on the left sides of the receivers.

For rifles with no import mark, I'm not sure... Does the receiver even have an original serial number on it? Where? Maybe it's just the barrel serial then.
Whootsinator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2009, 05:16 PM   #12
Firearm Aficionado
 
Yogi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 854
Cool

I could not even watch the whole thing! Why would you cut down a barrel 8" when it's a sniper? The idea is okay. (hear me out) A custom WOOD stock, turn down bolt, add a flash hidder, (nice scope and mount, from all I watched) NO plastic parts!!!!!! An Ar pistol grip and collapsable stock??? A PISTOL GRIP!!!! Sorry. Had to compress. Is he using a sndbag for a shoulder pad??? After all is said and done, shouldn't the Bi pod be mounted the other way so it won't catch on any obstructions? Overall---NO!!!
__________________
The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
Yogi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2009, 07:43 PM   #13
Firearm Enthusiast
 
greenhell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Willis, Texas
Posts: 87
I agree with Yogi. The mod concept is OK but the AR bits just don't work for a Mosin. It is almost like someone putting a wood stock on a AR and calling it a retro mod or something. Yes it can be done but it shouldn't.
__________________
Are you going to come quietly or do I need ear plugs??
greenhell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2009, 08:56 PM   #14
Freedom Zealot
 
SwedeSteve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Anchortown, Alaska
Posts: 33,734
^ I agree !! Just looks wrong.
__________________
I keep tellin ya Doc, I'm in pretty good shape considerin the shape I'm in !!
SwedeSteve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2009, 09:17 PM   #15
Firearm Zealot
 
Geo M44's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Back in the PRK
Posts: 3,114
Say what you will, but that was/is very creative. According to the video the bolt and receiver were both custom machined.

I agree that the choice of a somewhat rare 1928 91/30 (or maybe it was an M91) was a little careless. It would have been better to lop off a counter-bored '43 or '44 but what the hey.

Just consider it the latest generation (2009 model) 1891 Mosin Nagant 3-line rifle.

Next we need to know if it shoots worth a damn.
__________________
Remember when seconds count... the police are only minutes away.
Geo M44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2009, 09:38 PM   #16
Firearm Aficionado
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 1,089
I think it looks okay. I kinda like it. I certainly would NOT do it to one of mine. If I wanted a modern sniper I would buy a modern sniper.

I watched the range video. The bipod looks extremely flimsy.

Did he say he machined a NEW receiver for it? I don't think that's legal.
matt760 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2009, 09:52 PM   #17
Firearm Aficionado
 
Whootsinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,080
It's completely legal. In fact, there are vendors online that sell receiver blanks for AR-15 type rifles. You buy them then machine them out yourself, and you don't have to do any paperwork. No one ever has to know unless you tell them.
Whootsinator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2009, 10:58 PM   #18
Firearm Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 7
I don't see why people flip out every time someone mods their mosin. Mosin shoots a cheap round so therefore its a great platform for a sniper type rifle used for target shooting. i think its pretty sweet. There is clearly a large surplus of these rifles anyway if you can buy them for 80-200 bucks. some of the older ones that have seen action and are actual historic guns they should be preserved, If i were to do this I would have done it to a newer rifle that dont have much history to them.
Travism91 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2009, 11:02 PM   #19
Firearm Aficionado
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 1,089
Quote:       Originally Posted by Whootsinator View Post
It's completely legal. In fact, there are vendors online that sell receiver blanks for AR-15 type rifles. You buy them then machine them out yourself, and you don't have to do any paperwork. No one ever has to know unless you tell them.

Right, so then it's NOT legal?

To buy a receiver blank IS legal. But to build a firearm without the knowledge of the BATFE is NOT legal. Isn't there something about a $200 tax for such endeavors? I already had this debate about silencers.

Just because you CAN do it, doesn't mean it's legal. You saying "no one ever has to know unless you tell them" implies to me that you know it's not truly on the up and up.

Was I misinformed? Is it legal to build a firearm on a newly manufactured receiver that has no serial number? I know that before some date (early 1900's I believe) some guns were not required to have serial numbers. They, obviously, would be exempt from such a law; however, that is not what we are talking about here.

Am I wrong here? If so I'll gladly admit that I was either misinformed, or I misinterpreted the laws on this subject.

If I am wrong, then does that mean anybody can build any kind of modern firearm they want to in their garage....or does that "as long as you don't get caught" stipulation apply here?

When buying a 1911 frame from Brownells or Midway it has to go through an FFL. When buying a Savage receiver from the same vendors it also has to go through an FFL. Did I miss something?


Sorry guys didn't mean to hijack the thread.

Last edited by matt760; 09-20-2009 at 11:19 PM.
matt760 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2009, 01:15 PM   #20
Firearm Zealot
 
R5CYA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: San Bruno, Republic of Kalifornia
Posts: 5,543
Quote:       Originally Posted by matt760 View Post
Right, so then it's NOT legal?

To buy a receiver blank IS legal. But to build a firearm without the knowledge of the BATFE is NOT legal. Isn't there something about a $200 tax for such endeavors? I already had this debate about silencers.

Just because you CAN do it, doesn't mean it's legal. You saying "no one ever has to know unless you tell them" implies to me that you know it's not truly on the up and up.

Was I misinformed? Is it legal to build a firearm on a newly manufactured receiver that has no serial number? I know that before some date (early 1900's I believe) some guns were not required to have serial numbers. They, obviously, would be exempt from such a law; however, that is not what we are talking about here.

Am I wrong here? If so I'll gladly admit that I was either misinformed, or I misinterpreted the laws on this subject.

If I am wrong, then does that mean anybody can build any kind of modern firearm they want to in their garage....or does that "as long as you don't get caught" stipulation apply here?

When buying a 1911 frame from Brownells or Midway it has to go through an FFL. When buying a Savage receiver from the same vendors it also has to go through an FFL. Did I miss something?


Sorry guys didn't mean to hijack the thread.
.

i'm pretty sure you're mistaken.
you can buy parts kits for guns that are de-milled per atf specs (usually by cutting the receiver in two places with a cutting torch) and build your own receiver to assemble it back to a working firearm without having to register it.
__________________
Badges? We got no badges! i aint gotta show you no stinking badges!
R5CYA is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Gun & Game - The Friendliest Gun Forum on the Internet > General > The Powder Keg

Tags
91 or 30, custom, machined, modified, sniper

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:53 PM.




Recent Discussions

Connect with us!
Advertisement



"It don't cost nuthin' to be nice." -- Mike West