Old 10-13-2009, 02:03 PM   #1
Firearm Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Macomb, Illinois
Posts: 21
Reload velocity?

I'm going to soon start reloading for my M1 Garand. I'm wondering what sort of velocity I should shoot for. I plan on reloading 150 grain bullets and I figure a Garand would give close to the velocity a reloading manual gives, maybe just a little bit less. I'm mainly want the gun to function well without any undue wear and I am not looking for getting the most velocity possible.
dodgeman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2009, 07:08 PM   #2
Firearm Aficionado
 
twtalbot's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 603
Get a Hornady 7th edition manual. It lists loads specifically tuned for the M1 rifle. With H335, N-135, and IMR 4064 (not listed in that manual but still M1 safe) it's easy to duplicate M2 loads.
__________________
My rifle and pistol are only tools. I am the weapon.
twtalbot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2009, 07:33 PM   #3
Ret First Sergeant
 
jerry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 16,868
Blog Entries: 2
Hello from Peoria area Sir.

Take above advice and concentrate more on pressures than velocity. I have some Garand data I can post up later. It's on my work puter.
jerry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2009, 11:37 PM   #4
Firearm Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Macomb, Illinois
Posts: 21
I've got a Hornaday manual but its several years old, maybe as many as 12 years old. I know pressure is the ultimate limit of any reload. The way I'm looking at it, I will have a set bullet weight, and I have to start somewhere for a load, and I thought I would try for a certain velocity that would allow the rifle to function. I guess I'm looking for a velocity as the starting point for a reload that will make the rifle function without undo wear.

I would apprecitate any data you have.
dodgeman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2009, 11:42 PM   #5
Firearm Zealot
 
M14man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: FLA
Posts: 2,240
Choose one of the approved powders..IMR 4895, IMR 4064, H4895 etc; and stay close to 2700 fps. That should work fine.....I use 47 grains of IMR 4895 and it functions my Garands.
M14man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2009, 11:43 PM   #6
Firearm Zealot
 
Mooseman684's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Alaska Wilderness. Master Gunsmith
Posts: 17,245
The U.S. Govt specs for M2 Ball ammo was 50.0 Grains of IMR4895...This was for a 147 to 150 grain FMJ Ball projectile at 2740 fps @ 78 ft from the muzzle...
Rich
__________________
[I]You know you might be facing your doom,when all you get is a click when you're expecting a BOOM!:( [/I]
Mooseman684 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2009, 11:05 PM   #7
Firearm Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 55
Quote:      
I know pressure is the ultimate limit of any reload.
True enough, but the Garand has another presssure limit, and that one is associated with the operating rod. (It's actually a pressure/time limit, because you have to limit the amount of energy you kick the rod with or you'll bend it, or batter the receiver into cracking, or both...)

The Garand action was tested to the point of cracking one of the bolt lugs at some ridiculous pressure (70,000 psi?) and then was used to fire several thousand rounds past that point. It isn't the action you have to worry about.

As others have mentioned, look up Garand-specific load data. This will show powders which have the correct burn rate to protect the op-rod. Velocities which duplicate military ammo are typically around 2700 fps, I believe.

You can work with slower powders (and typical .30-06 commercial ammo, not "light magnum" stuff) by swapping the gas cylinder lock screw for an adjustable one. This doesn't perform magic, but it does allow for slower powders by venting excess pressure. You have to start wide open and adjust smaller until the op-rod just cycles reliably. That's the adjustment for that powder/bullet combination. If you change loads, you have to adjust all over again.

The Garand is a terrific rifle, but the op-rod is its Achille's heel. Long and slender, it is easily bent...
dmazur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2009, 10:54 AM   #8
Firearm Aficionado
 
twtalbot's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 603
Quote:       Originally Posted by dmazur View Post

...The Garand is a terrific rifle, but the op-rod is its Achille's heel. Long and slender, it is easily bent...
The Garand was a pioneering rifle. It broke new ground in previously uncharted territory. At that time, it was believed that a gas port must be as close to the muzzle as possible, resulting in that long op rod.
__________________
My rifle and pistol are only tools. I am the weapon.
twtalbot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-29-2009, 10:41 PM   #9
Firearm Zealot
 
Full MeTal Jack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Southeast Texas
Posts: 2,013
This load has been exceptional in my Garands
168 Sierra HPBT
CCI 200 Primer
46 grains of !MR 4064
Remington Brass

Welcome Dodgeman
I too own a Dodge. 2008 1500 Quadcab 5.7 Hemi with the extras. Love it.
__________________
Guns and cameras don't mix

Last edited by Full MeTal Jack; 10-29-2009 at 10:43 PM.
Full MeTal Jack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-26-2009, 08:17 PM   #10
Firearm Aficionado
 
Twitch2120's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Tucker, GA
Posts: 1,192
bringin this one back from the dead. no sense starting a new thread.

just got my hornady manual today and im a tad confused. the military m2 ball load of IMR4895 with a 150gr on top is what id like to go for BUT Mooseman says thats 50 grains of powder. the hornady manual lists the top load for a 150 gr bullet at 47.9 gr of n-135. thats 2gr off the m2 listing. worse yet they dont even LIST IMR as an option for 150 gr bullets. it doest show till you get into 168gr bullets. what gives?

the 47.9 gr is the HEAVIEST charge listed for any bullet/powder combo. did hornady just decide to skip the m2 loading? would loading to 50 gr of 4895 be bad juju? im just starting out and have 0 interest of learning the hard way about overcharging a round
__________________
The right to bear arms is WAY less ludicrous than the right to arm bears!
Twitch2120 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2009, 10:51 PM   #11
Firearm Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 55
Powders are not interchangeable. So, you can't compare 47.9gr of N-135 with 50 gr of IMR4895 and say there's a 2 gr difference.

Yes, there is a 2gr difference in charge weights, but that says nothing about the pressures or velocities developed.

Also, be advised that IMR4895 and H4895 are not the same powder. A reference to "4895" is not sufficient to distinguish between these two.

The safest thing to do, if you don't have an adjustable gas nut, is to stick with "Garand safe" loads from published sources.

Here's a magazine article from Guns & Ammo re: Garand reloading -

Match-Grade .30-06
dmazur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-27-2009, 11:58 PM   #12
Firearm Zealot
 
Mooseman684's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Alaska Wilderness. Master Gunsmith
Posts: 17,245
Quote:       Originally Posted by Twitch2120 View Post
bringin this one back from the dead. no sense starting a new thread.

just got my hornady manual today and im a tad confused. the military m2 ball load of IMR4895 with a 150gr on top is what id like to go for BUT Mooseman says thats 50 grains of powder. the hornady manual lists the top load for a 150 gr bullet at 47.9 gr of n-135. thats 2gr off the m2 listing. worse yet they dont even LIST IMR as an option for 150 gr bullets. it doest show till you get into 168gr bullets. what gives?

the 47.9 gr is the HEAVIEST charge listed for any bullet/powder combo. did hornady just decide to skip the m2 loading? would loading to 50 gr of 4895 be bad juju? im just starting out and have 0 interest of learning the hard way about overcharging a round
Powders and weights are NOT Interchangeable...
Hornady Volume II lists all the IMR powders , BUT for SP 150 Gr. Bullets in 30/06...not FMJ which can vary slightly.
That is why I gave you the EXACT U.S. Military specification for a duplicate load.
Rich
__________________
[I]You know you might be facing your doom,when all you get is a click when you're expecting a BOOM!:( [/I]
Mooseman684 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-28-2009, 12:31 AM   #13
Firearm Zealot
 
gunnerdave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,614
I've had a couple of editions of the Hornady Manual. I've noticed a fair bit of difference in the loads they've recommended in different editions. I suspect because as time goes on and components change, so do the loads they consider to be the best all around, and they only recommend what they think works the best with their bullets/brass. It is excellent data, but there is other good data out there. It can be a bit tricky to find good M1 specific data. If you stick with the recommended powders and work up your loads carefully, you can make some really good safe ammo. My favorites are Varget, AA2520, & H4895. I don't try to be adventurous with my M1 loads.

HTH

Dave
__________________
Show me where Josef Stalin is buried & I'll show you a communist plot.
gunnerdave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2009, 12:08 PM   #14
Firearm Zealot
 
roverboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Moss,Tn.
Posts: 1,950
I know that IMR 4895 is the optimum powder
for the Garand, but I have several pounds
of IMR4350 and as wondering if that would
be ok? I can't believe I just used optimum.
lol.
__________________
"Congratulations, how does it feel to be an All American"? " I gotta pee"!
roverboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2009, 04:16 PM   #15
Firearm Aficionado
 
twtalbot's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 603
IMR 4350 is too slow to be safe with an "as issued" Garand, However, the adjustable gas plug costs just a little more than a pound of powder, so if you have several pounds the plug may be worth it.
__________________
My rifle and pistol are only tools. I am the weapon.
twtalbot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-12-2009, 07:33 PM   #16
Firearm Zealot
 
roverboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Moss,Tn.
Posts: 1,950
Quote:       Originally Posted by twtalbot View Post
IMR 4350 is too slow to be safe with an "as issued" Garand, However, the adjustable gas plug costs just a little more than a pound of powder, so if you have several pounds the plug may be worth it.
Thanks I may buy a adjustable gas plug. Then again I'll
probably just get some IMR4895. I won't be using much
of it. I'll probably just use it in the Garand and Johnson.
__________________
"Congratulations, how does it feel to be an All American"? " I gotta pee"!
roverboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Gun & Game - The Friendliest Gun Forum on the Internet > General > The Powder Keg

Tags
reload, velocity

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:24 AM.




Recent Discussions

Connect with us!
Advertisement



"It don't cost nuthin' to be nice." -- Mike West