Old 10-24-2009, 07:32 AM   #1
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 4,617
Florida: Public housing ban on guns challenged

Despite the seemingly national groundswell in favor of gun ownership, Johnie E. Lewis, a 73 year old man living in public housing in Fernandina Beach, could face eviction for his desire to bear arms. Under a Housing Authority of Fernandina Beach lease agreement that tenants must sign, they agree not to display, use or possess any firearms under penalty of eviction for now, anyway.

More...
GGReporter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2009, 01:51 PM   #2
Resident Curmudgeon
 
Cyrano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: New York
Posts: 15,331
I seem to remember that the NRA fought this same issue against the San Francisco Housing Authority earlier this year and won the case, thereby requiring the SF Housing Authority to leave gun owners who live in public house administered by San Franscico alone; that SF can't void leases or evict them for owning guns. Why was this precedent not mentioned in the article?
Cyrano is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2009, 03:56 PM   #3
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1
Is he living in a Goverment funding housing if so owning a fire arm is not allowd which is a bunch of????? but that is the way it is . Granted its not right .You do have the right to bear arms in this country . Its another way the goverment is trying to controll its people its B,S. but what can ya do...
murdok48 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-24-2009, 04:54 PM   #4
Firearm Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: republic of Texas
Posts: 108
What's the worse they could do if they caught a renter posessing a gun? Eviction? Jail? What would happen if the hapless renter had to use the firearm for self protection? Again, what would happen? I would rather take my chances that i would not get caught with the firearm in my posession while living there, as opposed to being a victim of a senseless crime while unarmed and waiting for the police. Some laws are just silly and some are stupid in regard to self protection. I have to wonder what some of the anti-gun nuts would do if they were unarmed and confronted by a perp. I'll bet that most would be armed and dangerous waiting for the next time. Crime has a way of bringing out the best in firearm self protection.
hay1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2009, 07:39 AM   #5
Firearm Aficionado
 
cjleete's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: SE Virginia
Posts: 1,496
Is it just me or does it seem like civil service in the US attracts the anti-gun types more than any other sector? I know many exceptions, but they are a drop in the bucket
__________________
"Yeah I'm playing with a full deck, all Jokers of course"
cjleete is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2009, 04:07 PM   #6
Firearm Aficionado
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: NE OK
Posts: 1,195
I think a lot of it is there are so many Dems in office that people who think like them get the jobs. Whenever you see an anti gun chief of police he/she has almost always been appointed by a Dem mayor.
G. Green is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Gun & Game - The Friendliest Gun Forum on the Internet > General > The Powder Keg

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:19 AM.




Recent Discussions

Connect with us!
Advertisement



"It don't cost nuthin' to be nice." -- Mike West