Quote:
Originally Posted by
Elvis Is Dead
Dont blame the gun for some moron's ineptitude in firearm safety. Stupidity knows no bounds or brands, makes, or models when it come to gun safety... I can point to you videos of people shooting 1911's shotguns, and revolvers that well... shouldn't be shooting them.
Sigs, HKs, SW S&Ps, Glocks, and XDs are all fine guns get the one thats most comfortable for you. Other than that, replace the recoil spring every 5,000 rounds, clean it like another gun and your good to go.
Glocks are combat pistols that are rugged, reliable and work off the KISS principle. If something breaks the company will fix it for you.
If you dont like the grip angle its no skin off my back lol (<--- as a "Glock fan") use whats good for you.
I will say though that personally I go from shooting my Kimber 1911 to my Glock 17 and I dont even know the difference. Technically speaking you could have the worst possible grip on any gun but if you have proper sight picture FRONT SIGHT focus and trigger control you will still put that shot on target.
I wouldnt say that Gaston Glock's previous inexperience with firearm design would be a flaw or that the aggressive grip angle is anything new however.
As I recall Mikhail Kalashnikov wasnt exactly a "gun" designer either before he set out to make a new assault rifle,. Eugene Stoner specialized aircraft engineering before going into firearms, and John Garand worked in a tool manufactoring plant before going on to design the M1. And the Luger had a pretty steep grip angle too.
All the guns Ive carried either on duty or off, the closest thing Ive had to a tangible safety was a decocker with DA/SA no thumb or grip safety.
But again if the grip angle or no mechanical safety irk you that badly dont get a glock.
A glock is just another tool in the tool box, I own 2 but they arnt the only brands I own or would trust my life too.