| | #1 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: (SW) Portland, OR
Posts: 406
| Remington 700 Variants Hey all, just got back from a large gunshow, apparantly the largest all year in OR. I came across a rifle that really caught my eye, and if it hadn't been 900.00 I would have taken her home for sure. It was a short barrelled "police model" Rem 700 chambered for .308. It didn't have the specific make, and stupidly i didn't ask for it. I'm a small guy (about 5'6, 130lbs) with pretty short arms, so the short barrel really appealed to me. (With my RRA AR15, I'm comfortable shooting with the telestock 2-3 positions from fully closed.) I wouldnt mind getting one of those used. I was told I could find one used for as low as 400. Dunno if it's true though. I was looking around on Impactguns.com trying to just find it, and i found two that look like it. The weird thing is the huge price difference. Anyone know why? Even if you dont, what can you tell me about...well anything I mentioned I guess? They had the same rifle in .243 and .223 as well as .300winmag but I have been told and believe myself that the .308 is a great performer, plus its pretty cheap. Here are the two rifles: Remington 700 308 Special Purpose Synthetic Tactical, Hogue Stock Remington 700 LTR 308 (Light Tactical Rifle) Is the cheaper model really that much worse? I woudn't need to shoot past 400yds. Thanks |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Banned Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 60
| The expensive one has a fluted barrel and a better stock. Plus, if you paint anything black and call it "tactical", it's automatically worth 30% more! |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: (SW) Portland, OR
Posts: 406
| They're both black haha. So you think the first one will serve me well? |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Banned Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 60
| ......but they're only calling one tactical. |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: (SW) Portland, OR
Posts: 406
| |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 145
| im sure either would do fine with a good scope and bullet match! i would probably go with the cheaper one if your on a budget so you have some money left for a scope, rings and whatever else you may want. or if you have money to spend then go ahead with the more pricey one! |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: (SW) Portland, OR
Posts: 406
| for 400yards and under, does anyone have any scope reccomendations? Would a 3-9X40 be ok? They have nice ones at some sporting goods stores around here for about 75.00, seems low from what i read on here |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Banned Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 60
| Get on E-bay and buy an old Weaver or Lyman 4 or 6X. More bang for your buck. 6X is plenty. You don't need a variable for that kinda distance. |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: (SW) Portland, OR
Posts: 406
| ...whats wrong with a scope that can do 3-9? 6x is included in that. I've never understood the advantage of a fixed-power scope... I dont think i could see a bulls eye on a target all that well from 300 yards with 6X... |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Banned Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 60
| Fewer moving parts to break. In his price range, they WILL break. Plus, higher magnification gets novice shooters to thinking they can shoot farther than they can. |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Senior Member ![]() Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: South Arkansas
Posts: 10,709
| What ever scope or power you buy I would recommend a 50mm for one of these rifles. You will be able to see better all around...A.H |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Banned Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Tn
Posts: 623
| The price range you mentioned for a scope can be difficult for finding a decent quality scope. I'd first recommend a moderate power and medium sized objective lens as the higher power and big objective scopes are MORE costly to produce. I'd look for a sale on a medium sized scope; a 2-7x32 or 3-9x40 as two examples. Here's a few models that are slightly higher priced than you mentioned but known for consistent quality/dollar. The last link is an exceptional value. Midway's site also has a link on each of those pages to see customer ratings of each scope. Good luck! MidwayUSA - Sightron S1 Scope 3-9x 40mm Plex Reticle Matte MidwayUSA - Sightron S1 Scope 3-9x 40mm Mil-Dot Reticle Matte Nikon 3-9x40 ProStaff Riflescope This is an excellent Value; it's a Bushnell Elite 3200 rebadged to Browning and a $200+ scope! Natchez Shooters Supplies - Bushnell Products - Bushnell Browning Scope 3-9X40 [b][i]Well, Let's add these too then... The Optic Zone - Detail Weaver 3-9x38 Classic V9 Series Rifle Scope [Nikon 3-9x40 ProStaff Riflescope Nikon 3-9x40 ProStaff Riflescope Last edited by turner; 03-15-2008 at 04:06 PM. Reason: another link |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: (SW) Portland, OR
Posts: 406
| no, you guys misunderstood me. I am willing to spend around 150 for a scope, I just said i saw ones at some sporting goods stores for 75.00 and that seemed low. I don't think you can get much of a 400yd scope for under 100 |
| | |
| | #14 | |
| Registered User Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: Indiana
Posts: 7
| Quote:
With that said the SPS Tactical would serve you well. It is like the LTR without flutes and a Hogue stock instead of the HS Precision used on the LTR. You could get the SPS Tactical for now and always find a HS Precision or B&C Medalist stock later and sell the Hogue stock. I won a HS Precision stock on eBay early last year and then later bought a SPS Varmint and dropped it right in. I also have a .223 LTR and it is has been my most accurate rifle ever. Back when I bought mine they were "only" $789. But I had a trade and did not have to pay much difference. | |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: (SW) Portland, OR
Posts: 406
| Ah, Thanks. Considering the "Special Pupose Hogue Stock" one is under 600, I woudn't mind saving myself the trouble of looking in pawn shops and just buying it new. With a decent fixed power scope and a little skill from the shooter, I should be able to make shots at 350yds, yes? |
| | |