Welcome to the New GunAndGame.com
- Become a Contributing Member

Go Back   Gun and Game Forums > Firearms > Manufacturers > Ruger

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-02-2008, 04:39 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
mitch009's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: OR
Posts: 142
10/22 stainless target

Anyone have a 10/22 stainless target model with the heavy barrel? I'm thinking about getting one and would like to see some pics and hear your reviews.
mitch009 is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 01-03-2008, 01:01 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
KP90DC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 243
Images: 4
Quote:
Originally Posted by mitch009 View Post
Anyone have a 10/22 stainless target model with the heavy barrel? I'm thinking about getting one and would like to see some pics and hear your reviews.
I have this on the way and can have reviews after I get it. Sturm, Ruger & Co., Inc.
__________________
Visit:Http://www.earlyriserscoffeeshop.com
Calvin Wiles !!! HAPPY AND SAFE SHOOTING
KP90DC is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 01-03-2008, 01:30 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
jashoffa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Iowa
Posts: 701
Here is a pic of a one my firend owns. We had a blast this day at the range. I had my standard 10/22 there with a newly mounted scope and after I sighted it in we each fired mearly 500 rounds. It was a very fun time.

He had some dovetail rings for his scope this day and I suggest that you get weaver rings. It should come with a compination dovetail/weaver base. With the dovetails the scope would not hold zero. He has since changed and no problmes. As for the gun it is a very nice looking gun the stock looks great as does the barrel. It shoots well and is very reliable with quality ammo. Will jam up once in a while with the cheap bulk stuff, not really a problem though and no different them my 10/22. It stays right on target when you shoot as the heavy barrel makes the recoil disappear.

__________________
"I don't go shooting without my guns and they don't go shooting without me!"

Member NRA
jashoffa is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 01-03-2008, 04:45 PM   #4
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1
hello im new to the world of fire arms and would like some advice

wel ive recently had my licence thru for a .22rm 222. i also perchesed my first rifle the otha day a ruger 10/22 semi auto. after zeroing in ive managed to hit targets constantly at a distance off roughly 80yds with a grouping 0f about an 1inch with the wiinchester subsonic super x. ive also tried the remington hv and find these to be firing slightly higer. i am after some advice please on what is the best ammo for my gun on vermin eg rabbits squirells. also why do the remington every now and again sound more like concord breaking the sound barrier many thanks!
haslhoff is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 03-23-2008, 03:15 PM   #5
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 7
Hi I just picked up a K10/22-TS this week and fired only 50 rounds from it so far ! The barrel was in contact with the stock and so I opened up the channel for a no contact fit and will see if it shoots any better soon ! This is my first 10/22 and like it so far !
Attached Thumbnails
10/22 stainless target-resized-10-22.jpg  
rodentstopper is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 03-23-2008, 11:35 PM   #6
Member
 
sirptrk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Kansas USA, the middle of knowhere
Posts: 52
Images: 7
Although mine isnt a Stainless, I love my 20" match grade heavy barrel. You can shoot them all day without worring about heat build up and they arn't that much heavier. I bought it and a Houge overmolded stock for 135.00 thru J & G. For varments I prefer my 17 HMR, even though it is little more expensive to shoot.
Attached Thumbnails
10/22 stainless target-100_7650.jpg   10/22 stainless target-100_7656.jpg  
sirptrk is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 03-23-2008, 11:43 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
elmer fudd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: pheasant country USA!
Posts: 2,239
Quote:
Originally Posted by jashoffa View Post
Here is a pic of a one my firend owns. We had a blast this day at the range. I had my standard 10/22 there with a newly mounted scope and after I sighted it in we each fired mearly 500 rounds. It was a very fun time.

He had some dovetail rings for his scope this day and I suggest that you get weaver rings. It should come with a compination dovetail/weaver base. With the dovetails the scope would not hold zero. He has since changed and no problmes. As for the gun it is a very nice looking gun the stock looks great as does the barrel. It shoots well and is very reliable with quality ammo. Will jam up once in a while with the cheap bulk stuff, not really a problem though and no different them my 10/22. It stays right on target when you shoot as the heavy barrel makes the recoil disappear.

Nice gun and my favorite pack of bullets! LOL
__________________
spur hard, shoot straight, party hardy!
elmer fudd is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 03-24-2008, 05:04 PM   #8
Senior Member
 
billt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 184
S & K Gunstocks: Ruger 10/22 Bull Barrel Ultra Walnut (Extra Fancy)

I'm thinking of getting one and putting on one of these. Bill T.
billt is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 03-24-2008, 06:48 PM   #9
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by sirptrk View Post
Although mine isnt a Stainless, I love my 20" match grade heavy barrel. You can shoot them all day without worring about heat build up and they arn't that much heavier. I bought it and a Houge overmolded stock for 135.00 thru J & G. For varments I prefer my 17 HMR, even though it is little more expensive to shoot.
Hi I checked out the 17 HMR and found that it cost 10 times as much to shoot as 22LR and could not get ammo at the local gunshop and found only 200 rounds at the big box stores I went to. I think I will go with the 17 Rem.Fireball and Rem.model 7 rifle and load my own ammo for it.
rodentstopper is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 03-25-2008, 03:02 AM   #10
Member
 
sirptrk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Kansas USA, the middle of knowhere
Posts: 52
Images: 7
Yes, the 17 HMR is consideribly more expensive to shoot, I pay 12.85 a box of 50. Thats why I own my souped up 10-22 also. I dont think that you will find the 17 Rem.Fireball that much cheaper. I like the velocity and long range accuracy of my 17 HMR as long as the winds not blowing to hard. As far as finding ammo, I live in the middle of knowhere and it is readily available, and very popular, for coyotes, rabbit, armadillo, stray cats ect.

Last edited by sirptrk; 03-25-2008 at 03:04 AM.
sirptrk is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 03-25-2008, 06:43 AM   #11
Senior Member
 
billt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 184
What is this new ".17 Remington Fireball" going to accomplish that the standard .17 Remington won't? Bill T.
billt is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 03-25-2008, 06:45 PM   #12
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by billt View Post
What is this new ".17 Remington Fireball" going to accomplish that the standard .17 Remington won't? Bill T.
Hi The 17 Rem.is based on the 222 Rem case and the 17 Rem.Fireball is based on the 223 Rem. case. I already reload alot of 223 Rem. for my model 700 varmint rife and so for me it makes sence but may not for others to go with the Fireball.
rodentstopper is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 03-25-2008, 06:57 PM   #13
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by mitch009 View Post
Anyone have a 10/22 stainless target model with the heavy barrel? I'm thinking about getting one and would like to see some pics and hear your reviews.
Hi Here is a pic of my new K10/22-TS for you to see ! It shoots 1.5 inch groups at about 50 yards but I did a little work on the stock and I hope to do better next time out !
Attached Thumbnails
10/22 stainless target-10-22-ruger-004.jpg  
rodentstopper is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 03-25-2008, 07:00 PM   #14
Senior Member
 
billt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Glendale, Arizona
Posts: 184
Quote:
Originally Posted by rodentstopper View Post
Hi The 17 Rem.is based on the 222 Rem case and the 17 Rem.Fireball is based on the 223 Rem. case. I already reload alot of 223 Rem. for my model 700 varmint rife and so for me it makes sence but may not for others to go with the Fireball.
I think you better check on that. Unless I'm mistaken, the new "Fireball" round is a necked down Remington .221 Fireball case from the old XP-100 Bolt Action Pistol case from the early 60's. It's much smaller than either the .222 or .223. Bill T.

17 Remington Fireball

Last edited by billt; 03-25-2008 at 07:04 PM.
billt is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 03-25-2008, 08:11 PM   #15
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 7
Quote:
Originally Posted by billt View Post
I think you better check on that. Unless I'm mistaken, the new "Fireball" round is a necked down Remington .221 Fireball case from the old XP-100 Bolt Action Pistol case from the early 60's. It's much smaller than either the .222 or .223. Bill T.

17 Remington Fireball
Thank you billt ! You are right and there would be no using my old 223 brass for it and no savings $ there so the 17 Rem. is the way for me to go ! Thanks for the info !
rodentstopper is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 03-25-2008, 11:22 PM   #16
Senior Member
 
mitch009's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: OR
Posts: 142
Anyone have any idea what type of scope that is?
mitch009 is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 03-26-2008, 09:27 AM   #17
Senior Member
 
jashoffa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Iowa
Posts: 701
The scope he has on there is a Tasco if I remember right. Not my choice but it works well for him.


Here is my setup that I was shooting that day. We were shooting up to 50 yards and I think that I was just as accurate as he was. we shot each others and I were shooting about the same. I suppose he might have had slightly tighter groups out of his.


I have been thinking about upgradng my barrel and stock to a heavy barrel version but I have other gun related projects I am saving for.
__________________
"I don't go shooting without my guns and they don't go shooting without me!"

Member NRA

Last edited by jashoffa; 03-26-2008 at 09:37 AM.
jashoffa is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 03-27-2008, 02:58 AM   #18
Member
 
sirptrk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Kansas USA, the middle of knowhere
Posts: 52
Images: 7
If you dont mind Black, J&G Sales has a really good deal on a stock and match grade heavy barrel for 138.00 ? I bought on and really like the way the gun shoots now, It is a Houge overmolded stock with the textured rubber Houge coating and sling studs and a Clerke match grade heavy barrel. It was an excellant fit and shoots excellant.
Attached Thumbnails
10/22 stainless target-100_7656.jpg  
sirptrk is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 04-08-2008, 07:25 PM   #19
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 7
K10-22TS after a few mods. At the range.

Quote:
Originally Posted by mitch009 View Post
Anyone have a 10/22 stainless target model with the heavy barrel? I'm thinking about getting one and would like to see some pics and hear your reviews.
I had to do some work on the K10-22TS. Stoned the hammer radius and engagement areas/ Polished the sear/reset and disconnector/ Replaced the trigger return spring/ Auto-bolt release modded/Added VQ bolt buffer.The trigger is much lighter and without any creep now. My groups are now less than .5 inch at 50 yards. I think that I can do better with more practice. It's a great little gun!
rodentstopper is offline   Reply With Quote


Old 04-23-2008, 09:59 PM   #20
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Port Orchard Wa
Posts: 147
I just bought a 10-22 like this. stainless bull barrel the kid behind the counter said that these barrels are hammer formed. but i cant find any info. does anyone have input on how these are formed.
thebigitch62 is offline   Reply With Quote


Reply

Gun and Game Forums > Firearms > Manufacturers > Ruger

Thread Tools



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:22 PM.


[Output: 107.06 Kb. compressed to 95.78 Kb. by saving 11.28 Kb. (10.54%)]