|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Joplin, Missouri
Posts: 55
|
Side scope mount?
I'm thinking of putting one of these on my Norinco SKS:
![]() By mounting it on the stock, I can alleviate the problem of having to take the scope off every time I clean the gun. I can then put a scope on THIS instead. IS this a good idea? It sounds like a good idea to me but I'm new to this rifle and, frankly, to rifles in general.
__________________
http://www.liberalswithguns.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Joplin, Missouri
Posts: 55
|
I don't know. That is why I'm asking for advice. Anyone here ever done what I want to do? Did it work? Or am I wasting time and money putting holes in my pretty stock?
__________________
http://www.liberalswithguns.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
I'm not sure about that. I don't know about others, but my folding stock, my Tapco, and my Dad's Monte Carlo all move around a little bit inside the stock. If it moves at all inside the stock, it will not keep zero.
__________________
Doing the unexpected makes the unexpected the expected and thus the expected becomes the unexpected.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 (permalink) |
|
Moderator
![]() Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Tallahassee, Florida
Posts: 9,751
|
Scope mounted of STOCK!? Not a good idea. Not secure.
That mount looks like the typical AK mount that bolts to the RECEIVER.
__________________
Moderator of: AR15/M16, M14/M1A, New/Beginning Shooters and Militaria/Collectables. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Joplin, Missouri
Posts: 55
|
Quote:
Also, that IS a scope mount for an AK.
__________________
http://www.liberalswithguns.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
![]() |
While it is your SKS to do to as you choose, I have to say that you are going to go through a good deal of expense and headache to end up with something you'll be disappointed in.
__________________
Thank God we don't get as much Government as we pay for! -Will Rogers |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: South east Wisconsin
Posts: 2,387
|
I would have to agree with the majority here. Wood is not a stable medium to mount to. Wood gives. It would be better to drill and tap the receiver or attach a scout scope type set up.
__________________
"Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati" (If all else fails play dead)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Joplin, Missouri
Posts: 55
|
Quote:
I was starting to suspect that. ![]() Well, it gives me an excuse to buy a new rifle. I'm leaning towards the Stevens Model 200 short action in .308. Looks like a nice, dependable, no frills starter rifle.
__________________
http://www.liberalswithguns.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) | |
|
Banned
|
Quote:
Why not just learn to use the SKS sights? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
|
Some of us have bad eyes. I can barely see well enough to shoot at 100 yards tops. I'm comfortable up to 75. It'll get better soon as I go back and get some contacts as my glasses are several years old and too weak now. Optics help me out a ton.
__________________
Doing the unexpected makes the unexpected the expected and thus the expected becomes the unexpected.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: South east Wisconsin
Posts: 2,387
|
Another option might be the tech sights peep sights. I find it easier to use peep sights with my bad eyes than those damn tangents. I bought a set for my sks but have not put them on yet. Plan to soon though.
__________________
"Quando Omni Flunkus Moritati" (If all else fails play dead)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Joplin, Missouri
Posts: 55
|
Eventually I will, but I'm a new hunter. I haven't hunted anything larger than a groundhog...and by hunted, I mean I opened my back door and shot the groundhogs as they peeped out from beneath my shed with a .22 rifle. With my level of inexperience, my concern is that even with the sights I won't be able to hit a deer accurately enough to kill it humanely. I think I will buy the peep sights (someone else recommended them to me on another thread) but I want to do a lot of target shooting and be very comfortable with my accuracy before I try to take a deer with it. Maybe I'm being overly cautious...
__________________
http://www.liberalswithguns.com |
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) | |
|
Banned
|
Quote:
I think that if you practice carefully, and shoot about 500 rounds through your SKS, you will be plenty ready to whack a deer at 100 yards by fall. Start out at 25 yards and move back over the summer until you get to 100 yards. My personal opinion is that a scope is at best, a convenience, and at wost, a crutch (all due respect to the near sighted). I'm kind of old school and still think a newby ought to learn to shoot steel sights, then go to a scope if he wants to. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) | |
|
Member
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Joplin, Missouri
Posts: 55
|
Quote:
__________________
http://www.liberalswithguns.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) |
|
Senior Member
![]() |
Mitch has the right idea! Just shoot the damn thing, When you are ready to graduate, put a Tech-Sight on there and cut your groups in half! When you've shot that enough, you're ready for deer!
__________________
Thank God we don't get as much Government as we pay for! -Will Rogers |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
|