| | #1 |
| Senior Member | a 22 rifle or pistol for survival ?
a 22 pistol or rifle is to me a great survival tool for one you can kill alot small animals with it for the pot another there is a ton of ammo everywhere for it . for me i prefer a pistol and would carry a rifle for bigger critters . which leads me to this question would you prefer 22 rifle,pistol,or neither
|
| | |
| | #2 |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2007 Location: Alaska
Posts: 1,552
|
if you need to be mobile and dont need to hit long shots a pistol is fine, but a rifle will be more accurate
|
| | |
| | #3 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: LaPlace, La (New Orleans)
Posts: 104
| Rifle for me
I would say rifle. Much more accurate. If you are worried about weight you can look for a smaller rifle. Ive seen a few little brownings and I own a Remington Nylon. I could carry that thing for a week!
|
| | |
| | #4 |
| Senior Member ![]() Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,237
|
I love them both.some of my fondest memories include a .22 rimfire. sam.
|
| | |
| | #5 |
| Senior Member ![]() Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 978
|
I'd take the pistol. I have a Ruger Mk II, 50th Anniversary Edition, which means that it's the Mk II with an engraving on top. The only thing that I'm learning about holsters is that I would need a sturdy leather holster on a seperate belt. When I go to the sandpit to shoot I wear a cordura high ride, and it really leans away from my body. It tugs on my belt. Need a seperate belt and better holster for all day wear. I'm not the most accurate shot (hence my pen name) so I would include a walking staff to rest the gun on for shots at small game. |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Edmonds, WA
Posts: 3,639
|
__________________ |
| | |
| | #8 |
| spiritual counselor ![]() ![]() |
and then youve got a 410 also those things even float! i think they are a great invention
__________________ "I would never die for my beliefs because what if I'm wrong?"- Bertrand Russell Last edited by billy; 07-22-2007 at 08:51 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Central Florida
Posts: 459
| A .22 Pistol carried in a holster would leave your hands free for other things when
not hunting for game. I was watching a guy on a survival program throw a stick at a rabbit and kill it so I guess I could at least hit a rabbit with a Ruger Auto or maybe an old S&W Kit pistol. The key to hitting things with a pistol is plain old practice. You don't have to hit bullseyes, just be reasonably accurate. Practice, Practice, Practice. |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,259
|
I'd have to go with a rifle, with an ammo pouch full of a few hundred rounds.
|
| | |
| | #12 |
| Moderator ![]() Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Tallahassee, Florida
Posts: 10,421
|
Depends on the situation. 1) You made it to your BO site, and have many guns available. You are small game hunting close to your retreat. I'd carry a good .22 rifle, backed up with a good CF pistol for defense. 2) You are bugging out afoot. Weight is at a premium. You'll do your hunting at closer ranges, stalking your prey. A .22 pistol is best - a good one that is proven accurate at 25-30 yards. You'll be carrying a good battle rifle for defense. There are many variables in both these situations.
__________________ Moderator of: AR15/M16, M14/M1A, New/Beginning Shooters and Militaria/Collectables. |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Miami, Fl.
Posts: 331
|
I love my Ruger S/S 10/22, I have it with a Butler Creek folding stock and 50 round magazines. Great for squirrels, rabbits and even larger game like small deer, if I could only have one weapon this would be high on the list.
|
| | |
| | #14 |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2007 Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 3,175
|
Think I'd opt for both as the weight overall in our situation would be negligible and both would be handy to have.
__________________ "You can have my Freedom when I'm done with it!" |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Senior Member | I was just thinking the same thing. I would trust my luck with a Buckmark Camper and a 10/22. Think how much ammo you could carry comfortably in a bug out situation.
__________________ You don't shoot to kill; you shoot to stay alive. |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Senior Member Join Date: May 2007 Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 3,175
|
Well a bug out for us includes a heavily outfitted CJ3B and a small tracker boat (both for cargo and possible river/lake travel). My Missus has had major reconstructive knee surgery twice over the years and appears there is a third on the horizon. So weight for us isn't as high a priority as it may be for some.
__________________ "You can have my Freedom when I'm done with it!" |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Banned Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: philly
Posts: 69
|
i agree , last month a put a bipod on my ruger 10/22 and realized the firepower you could get from that thing ..... no recoil means all 30 .22 bullets are gonna go where you put them , i can ammagine layin down some irratateing fire lol plus the ammo is light and cheap and quiet ....safe the big stuff for when you really need it
|
| | |
| | #18 |
| Moderator ![]() Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Tallahassee, Florida
Posts: 10,421
|
Well, a good .22 is indispensable for small game hunting (though trapping/snaring is quieter, if you have the time), but you'll just attract more MZB's using it for defense. They get irritated by the stings too.
__________________ Moderator of: AR15/M16, M14/M1A, New/Beginning Shooters and Militaria/Collectables. |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Registered User Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 5
|
Something like a Marlin Model 60 or a Ruger 10/22 would be best overall. I personally like my Smith Model 63, 4 inch .22 LR revolver, but I think a rifle would be more practical.
|
| | |
| | #20 |
| Member Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Cowtown, Canada
Posts: 61
|
I'd say an American-180 would be your best bet. @:-) Modern Firearms - American-180 submachine gun Actually I found an interesting little number that many of you probably already know about, but I thought I'd bring up for discussion: The M6 survival rifle. It's a .22LR over-under combo with a .410 Bore shotgun. It has ammo storage in the stock. The following article details someone's modifications to a standard M6 to improve its utility as a 'survival system'. He adds supplies and additional storage to the weapon, so in an emergency if he grabs the gun he's got most of what he needs in one handy package. Springfield Armory M6 Very nifty! Last edited by Kale; 08-06-2007 at 12:03 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost |
| | |