Welcome to the New GunAndGame.com
Send Feedback - Back to the Old GunAndGame

Go Back   Gun and Game Forums > Firearms > Survival Forums > Survival Discussions

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-22-2007, 06:17 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
bored2bhere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: mississippi
Posts: 402
Images: 3
Blog Entries: 3
a 22 rifle or pistol for survival ?

a 22 pistol or rifle is to me a great survival tool for one you can kill alot small animals with it for the pot another there is a ton of ammo everywhere for it . for me i prefer a pistol and would carry a rifle for bigger critters . which leads me to this question would you prefer 22 rifle,pistol,or neither
bored2bhere is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2007, 06:23 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
cubbieman's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Alaska
Posts: 1,552
if you need to be mobile and dont need to hit long shots a pistol is fine, but a rifle will be more accurate
cubbieman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2007, 06:37 PM   #3
Senior Member
 
pecka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: LaPlace, La (New Orleans)
Posts: 104
Rifle for me

I would say rifle. Much more accurate. If you are worried about weight you can look for a smaller rifle. Ive seen a few little brownings and I own a Remington Nylon. I could carry that thing for a week!
pecka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2007, 07:28 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,237
I love them both.some of my fondest memories include a .22 rimfire. sam.
samuel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2007, 08:04 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 978
I'd take the pistol. I have a Ruger Mk II, 50th Anniversary Edition, which means that it's the Mk II with an engraving on top. The only thing that I'm learning about holsters is that I would need a sturdy leather holster on a seperate belt. When I go to the sandpit to shoot I wear a cordura high ride, and it really leans away from my body. It tugs on my belt. Need a seperate belt and better holster for all day wear.

I'm not the most accurate shot (hence my pen name) so I would include a walking staff to rest the gun on for shots at small game.
Triggerjerk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2007, 08:20 PM   #6
spiritual counselor
 
billy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: a secret lab on the shores of lake titicaca
Posts: 14,347
Images: 9
Blog Entries: 154
henry survival rifle
__________________
"I would never die for my beliefs because what if I'm wrong?"- Bertrand Russell
billy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2007, 08:23 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
just_a_car's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Edmonds, WA
Posts: 3,639
Quote:
Originally Posted by billy View Post
henry survival rifle
+1, with a small scope for the scope rail.
__________________
just_a_car is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2007, 08:49 PM   #8
spiritual counselor
 
billy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: a secret lab on the shores of lake titicaca
Posts: 14,347
Images: 9
Blog Entries: 154
and then youve got a 410 also

those things even float!
i think they are a great invention
__________________
"I would never die for my beliefs because what if I'm wrong?"- Bertrand Russell

Last edited by billy; 07-22-2007 at 08:51 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
billy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2007, 11:05 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
Dan22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Central Florida
Posts: 459
A .22 Pistol carried in a holster would leave your hands free for other things when

not hunting for game.

I was watching a guy on a survival program throw a stick at a rabbit and kill it so I guess I could at least hit a rabbit with a Ruger Auto or maybe an old S&W Kit pistol.

The key to hitting things with a pistol is plain old practice. You don't have to hit bullseyes, just be reasonably accurate. Practice, Practice, Practice.
Dan22 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-23-2007, 08:21 PM   #10
Senior Member
 
bored2bhere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: mississippi
Posts: 402
Images: 3
Blog Entries: 3
i agree!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
bored2bhere is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2007, 02:09 AM   #11
Senior Member
 
.22guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 4,259
I'd have to go with a rifle, with an ammo pouch full of a few hundred rounds.
.22guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2007, 05:12 AM   #12
Moderator
 
Big Dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Tallahassee, Florida
Posts: 10,421
Depends on the situation.
1) You made it to your BO site, and have many guns available. You are small game hunting close to your retreat. I'd carry a good .22 rifle, backed up with a good CF pistol for defense.

2) You are bugging out afoot. Weight is at a premium. You'll do your hunting at closer ranges, stalking your prey. A .22 pistol is best - a good one that is proven accurate at 25-30 yards. You'll be carrying a good battle rifle for defense.

There are many variables in both these situations.
__________________
Moderator of: AR15/M16, M14/M1A, New/Beginning Shooters and Militaria/Collectables.
Big Dog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2007, 06:52 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
mos19k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Miami, Fl.
Posts: 331
I love my Ruger S/S 10/22, I have it with a Butler Creek folding stock and 50 round magazines. Great for squirrels, rabbits and even larger game like small deer, if I could only have one weapon this would be high on the list.
mos19k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2007, 07:42 PM   #14
Senior Member
 
ezearln's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 3,175
Think I'd opt for both as the weight overall in our situation would be negligible and both would be handy to have.
__________________
"You can have my Freedom when I'm done with it!"
ezearln is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2007, 09:35 PM   #15
Senior Member
 
Father Time's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Northern Michigan
Posts: 375
Images: 2
Quote:
Originally Posted by ezearln View Post
Think I'd opt for both as the weight overall in our situation would be negligible and both would be handy to have.
I was just thinking the same thing. I would trust my luck with a Buckmark Camper and a 10/22. Think how much ammo you could carry comfortably in a bug out situation.
__________________
You don't shoot to kill; you shoot to stay alive.
Father Time is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2007, 09:44 PM   #16
Senior Member
 
ezearln's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 3,175
Well a bug out for us includes a heavily outfitted CJ3B and a small tracker boat (both for cargo and possible river/lake travel). My Missus has had major reconstructive knee surgery twice over the years and appears there is a third on the horizon. So weight for us isn't as high a priority as it may be for some.
__________________
"You can have my Freedom when I'm done with it!"
ezearln is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2007, 01:28 AM   #17
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: philly
Posts: 69
i agree , last month a put a bipod on my ruger 10/22 and realized the firepower you could get from that thing ..... no recoil means all 30 .22 bullets are gonna go where you put them , i can ammagine layin down some irratateing fire lol plus the ammo is light and cheap and quiet ....safe the big stuff for when you really need it
bravo30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-28-2007, 07:34 AM   #18
Moderator
 
Big Dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Tallahassee, Florida
Posts: 10,421
Well, a good .22 is indispensable for small game hunting (though trapping/snaring is quieter, if you have the time),
but you'll just attract more MZB's using it for defense. They get irritated by the stings too.
__________________
Moderator of: AR15/M16, M14/M1A, New/Beginning Shooters and Militaria/Collectables.
Big Dog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-02-2007, 08:21 PM   #19
Registered User
 
Mannlicher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Gainesville, FL
Posts: 5
Something like a Marlin Model 60 or a Ruger 10/22 would be best overall. I personally like my Smith Model 63, 4 inch .22 LR revolver, but I think a rifle would be more practical.
Mannlicher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2007, 08:31 PM   #20
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Cowtown, Canada
Posts: 61
I'd say an American-180 would be your best bet. @:-)
Modern Firearms - American-180 submachine gun

Actually I found an interesting little number that many of you probably already know about, but I thought I'd bring up for discussion: The M6 survival rifle. It's a .22LR over-under combo with a .410 Bore shotgun. It has ammo storage in the stock. The following article details someone's modifications to a standard M6 to improve its utility as a 'survival system'. He adds supplies and additional storage to the weapon, so in an emergency if he grabs the gun he's got most of what he needs in one handy package.
Springfield Armory M6

Very nifty!

Last edited by Kale; 08-06-2007 at 12:03 PM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Kale is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:53 PM.


[Output: 111.32 Kb. compressed to 102.30 Kb. by saving 9.03 Kb. (8.11%)]