Welcome to the New GunAndGame.com
Send Feedback - Back to the Old GunAndGame

Go Back   Gun and Game Forums > Firearms > Manufacturers > Taurus

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-24-2004, 10:10 PM   #1
Senior Member
 
Sniper[MI]'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Future 51st state, "New Hope"
Posts: 3,796
Okay Taurus Lovers

Tell me why to buy a Taurus over a Beretta, other than slightly lower cost.

Also, what is the difference between the 92B and the 92BNS.

Inquiring minds (bored silly tonight and my earlier taurus post got me to looking at their site in detail) want to know....

:target:
__________________
FNUH!
Sniper[MI] is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2004, 06:17 AM   #2
Senior Member
 
NRAJOE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Toledo,OH
Posts: 19,255
Images: 3
Look at them side by side and there are slight differences. But the Taurus goes bang just like the Beretta for less.
__________________
U.S. Army
1976-1979
237th Combat Engineers
Heilbronn, Germany
NRAJOE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2004, 07:13 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
SPOCAHP ANAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: SC-upstate
Posts: 4,192
Images: 1
Blog Entries: 6
Taurus = Lifetime warranty. Don't know about the Beretta
__________________
Spocrest Out!..........
SPOCAHP ANAR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2004, 12:04 PM   #4
Administrator
 
Jesse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 1,945
Images: 2
http://www.hipowersandhandguns.com/TaurusPT92.htm

Check this out, Mr. Camp's PT-92 is almost identical to mine...
__________________
Jesse
www.gunandgame.com

Jesse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2004, 01:10 PM   #5
Senior Member
 
NRAJOE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Toledo,OH
Posts: 19,255
Images: 3
Thumbs up

Nice....
__________________
U.S. Army
1976-1979
237th Combat Engineers
Heilbronn, Germany
NRAJOE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2007, 06:58 PM   #6
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: toronto, ontario. canada
Posts: 6
Hey brother, I'll tell you why i bought a Taurus PT-99 AF semi-auto 9mm pistol?.......... 'cause i needed it to compliment the fact that i was born under the sign of taurus and my ride is a 1992 Ford Taurus SHO!
Taurus_X_3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2007, 07:09 PM   #7
Senior Member
 
just_a_car's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Edmonds, WA
Posts: 3,639
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taurus_X_3 View Post
Hey brother, I'll tell you why i bought a Taurus PT-99 AF semi-auto 9mm pistol?.......... 'cause i needed it to compliment the fact that i was born under the sign of taurus and my ride is a 1992 Ford Taurus SHO!
Nice car! I prefer the Thunderbird SC, with the 3.8L Supercharged V6, but the SHO is more than capable of being a little sleeper!

Sorry, not trying to hijack, just wanted to comment on the car.
just_a_car is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2007, 12:36 PM   #8
Member
 
Scot Van's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Versailles, KY
Posts: 70
I have just added the new Taurus 1911 to my collection of .45 ACPs. It isn't as great at the Wilson or the Kimbers, but it also cost about 1/4th what they did. It is a very nice gun, far superior to my Rock Island Armory!
Scot Van is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2007, 02:18 PM   #9
Senior Member
 
ArkansasHunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: South Arkansas
Posts: 10,998
Scot Van Please give us more info about your newTaurus 1911 after you wring it out.
I am interrested in the stainless model in 40 SW.
Thanks A.H
ArkansasHunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2007, 02:46 PM   #10
Member
 
Scot Van's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Versailles, KY
Posts: 70
Taurus 1911 ACP

Quote:
Originally Posted by ArkansasHunter View Post
Scot Van Please give us more info about your newTaurus 1911 after you wring it out.
I am interrested in the stainless model in 40 SW.
Thanks A.H
You bet, A.H.! I've put about 200 rounds through it so far (about a week ago). We've got a practical handgun class this weekend. This will be the first time I'm not using a Kimber or my XD compact. Details as events warrant, but so far, it all is nails!

Also, I own several other Taurus models and love them all...especially the .44 Mag Raging Bull (the only drawback is that it says 'RAGING BULL' in gigantic engraved letters on the side.
Scot Van is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2007, 05:05 PM   #11
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 721
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scot Van View Post
I have just added the new Taurus 1911 to my collection of .45 ACPs. It isn't as great at the Wilson or the Kimbers, but it also cost about 1/4th what they did. It is a very nice gun, far superior to my Rock Island Armory!
The Rock Islands are Armscor. Dunno what that means because I have no experience with Armscor. The 45 Rock Is. 1911 maybe made in the Phillipines?
Zen900 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2007, 05:37 PM   #12
Senior Member
 
ArkansasHunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: South Arkansas
Posts: 10,998
Scot Van I ordered the 2007 Taurus catalog 2 weeks ago can't wait to get it.
Congrats on your stable of Taurus"s...My interest are the Compact Millennium Pro this one doe'snt come in 40 SW yet and I'm hopeing it will, the other is the PT 1911 stainless.
Thanks much for the reply and posting the info...Mike
ArkansasHunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2007, 09:11 PM   #13
Senior Member
 
SPOCAHP ANAR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: SC-upstate
Posts: 4,192
Images: 1
Blog Entries: 6
Scott how much did the taurus sell for? If you don't mind....
__________________
Spocrest Out!..........
SPOCAHP ANAR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2007, 09:45 PM   #14
Super Moderator
 
Mooseman684's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Alaska Wilderness
Posts: 10,566
Images: 2
I would Buy the Beretta over the Taurus Any day of the week.
I have worked on More Taurus Guns needing repair, but seldom have a Beretta come in for more than a cleaning . I have seen the internal machining of the Taurus guns and it SUCKS...Very rough and sloppy in a lot of cases.
Beretta's on the other hand are good craftsmanship and perfect tolerances.
You get what you pay for...
Rich
__________________
You know you might be facing your doom,when all you get is a click when you're expecting a BOOM!
Mooseman684 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2007, 10:01 AM   #15
Senior Member
 
ArkansasHunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: South Arkansas
Posts: 10,998
Mooseman thanks for the info...Do you work on very many Taurus revolvers ???
ArkansasHunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2007, 10:18 AM   #16
Member
 
Scot Van's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Versailles, KY
Posts: 70
Quote:
Originally Posted by SPOCAHP ANAR View Post
Scott how much did the taurus sell for? If you don't mind....

I bought the 1911 at a gun show for $519...There is a dealer here in Lexington (KY) who has one for $500 on the shelf now. Given the specs...

POLISHED FEED RAMP, LOWERED EJECTION PORT, AMBIDEXTROUS SAFETY, A BEAVERTAIL MEMORY PAD GRIP SAFETY, CUSTOM GRIP PANELS, VENTILATED TRIGGER AND HEINIES' STRAIGHT EIGHT 2-DOT SIGHTS

I'm very satisfied and would only consider changing to a comp. barrel if I intended to compete with it.

My next Taurus will be the Judge, which is a .45 Long/.410 five-shot revolver. Kind of a novelty item, but great for effect. And only 300 bucks!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mooseman684 View Post
I would Buy the Beretta over the Taurus Any day of the week.
I have worked on More Taurus Guns needing repair, but seldom have a Beretta come in for more than a cleaning . I have seen the internal machining of the Taurus guns and it SUCKS...Very rough and sloppy in a lot of cases.
Beretta's on the other hand are good craftsmanship and perfect tolerances.
You get what you pay for...
Rich
Consistency in all things, please...while they do make an ACP, I'm pretty sure that Beretta does not make a 1911, so this is not apples to oranges. Point of order also, Taurus' new R&D is largely done stateside now, so perhaps your experience has been with older items. The only excuse they have for shoddy craftsmanship is that they were MUCH cheaper then and were also designed abroad. This is part of Taurus' thrust to manufacture premium quality arms at a good price. You may want to consider those points when looking at a new 1911. They'll be charging much more for these in five years.

While I love my Beretta 9mm, I paid LOTS for it and I find that the Taurus company, in trying to establish itself as a major player, has held itself to very rigid quality control standards. You're comparing the world's oldest gun manufacturer to a relatively new Brazilian company (that has never pretended to be Beretta...or Sig...or any other premium line). This 1911 by Taurus is, for the money, the best item I've seen on the market to date. The 24/7 Tactical is also very nice, but others are similarly priced and perhaps a bit more has gone into the others' development. Give Taurus a chance to grow, and I think they'll suprise you.

Last edited by Scot Van; 04-10-2007 at 10:37 AM. Reason: Automerged Doublepost
Scot Van is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2007, 11:19 AM   #17
Super Moderator
 
Mooseman684's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Alaska Wilderness
Posts: 10,566
Images: 2
I have had several Taurus Titanium Revolvers come in that have locked up due to internal parts jamming up or coming apart after shooting less than a box of shells and That will get you killed in a defense situation. The internal machining was rough and sloppy...I only call it as I see it. When a Brand new gun basically has major malfunctions under normal use with factory ammo, then I am suspect of the entire line of weapons...I'm not telling you not to buy whatever you want, I am relaying what I have seen from personal experience. If Beretta is good enough to pass Military tests, then it should be Great for the civilian market as well. Dependability and safety is paramount where weapons are involved.
Rich
__________________
You know you might be facing your doom,when all you get is a click when you're expecting a BOOM!
Mooseman684 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2007, 11:41 AM   #18
Senior Member
 
ArkansasHunter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: South Arkansas
Posts: 10,998
I wanted to say that ! And I agree that Taurus is focused on being a top player.
They say in there catalog that they have a new state of the art facility.

When I was a teenager Taurus and Llama or what ever there name was were know as cheap junk hand guns yet Taurus has stayed the course and are produceing some very appealing pistols and I don't think the price they sell them for is a indicator of quality.

And most are very accurate.

With the time I have on my hands at present, I've searched all over the internet for gun test reports and reviews and so far more folks love there Taurus's than dislike them.

Personaly I can't justify spending the kind of money some here spend for firearms (Please don't take that wrong) So I tend to buy in the lower price ranges, Remington, Mossberg, H&R, Marlin, KelTec, Tauras and the like.

On the other hand, I thank Mooseman for his comment and advice because I'll look a lot closer at them before I buy. A.H
ArkansasHunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2007, 01:05 PM   #19
Member
 
Scot Van's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Versailles, KY
Posts: 70
Can't argue at all.

Good to take all advice into consideration. Obviously, Moose's experience is considerable and he wasn't just spouting off. Mooseman, I sure hope you know that there was no affront intended there! I was only pointing a disparity out and I really hope it didn't come across with detriment to your breadth of knowledge and skills (which clearly are greater than my own). All respect given to you.

Another point before I forget...I have seen one review (scrambling to find it in the stacks of gun review magazines on my desk...may take a while) that gave the Taurus 1911 a D grade, though the article admitted that it had lots to do with the magazines that come with the gun. To date, I've fired about 300 rounds through 'er without a single jam using the same mags, so perhaps the authors got flawed product. On the other hand, they're the experts, I'm certain they had other objections I can't remember now. Suffice it to say that so far, I'm very happy and will post any negative experiences immediatley (I've no loyalty to Taurus above ANY manufacturer, so you'll know what I know when I know it).

SVH

Last edited by Scot Van; 04-10-2007 at 01:05 PM. Reason: added text
Scot Van is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2007, 01:23 PM   #20
Senior Member
 
Beer Forever's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 2,718
I own one Taurus, a 66 6'' 7 shot .357, a direct copy of the S&W 686. It is a great wheel gun and like it a lot, my personal protection gun actually, but I wouldn't use a Taurus auto for protection. I have been around, fired, owned, worked on lots of Taurus autos and are not impressed, lots of inconsistencies. Berettas are smooth, but I am just not a fan of the 92, not that accurate, but dependable as all he11. I had a Taurus 1911 that I had to send back to the factory twice for problems. I'll take a Springfield over both!
__________________
Paramedic
sks forever
Beer Forever is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
okay, taurus, lovers

Thread Tools

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:41 PM.


[Output: 119.51 Kb. compressed to 110.25 Kb. by saving 9.26 Kb. (7.75%)]