| | #21 |
| Gun Liker ![]() |
For mine, its a bit gimmicky. I reckon most folk would be just as well served with a decent .22 and a 17hmr in 2 separate rifles. A brno .22 takes a !!!! of a lot of beating, as good a rifle as any SAKO is. The rule book says a barrel or conversion unit ( which must include those lil tube things that allow you to shoot 20 gauge in a 12 guage or .410 in a 20 ... which is petty & stupid ) is a catagory A firearm and would require licencing and therefore a permit to aquire for each barrel to my understanding. Its gunna cost close to the tune of 2 grand for a complete QUAD set up. Thats Aussie dollars at a competive shop. I reckon you`d prolly never have the `right barrel on the thing, I do this with my shotguns, you stick a number 8 in the chamber and see a pig, stick SSG in there and see a rabbit. Just my .02 though....
|
| | |
| | #22 |
| Senior Member |
Yeah, You are right, unless You had like a golf bag over your shoulder with all the barrels in it it'd be a waste of time, and money. Besides that, how much difference is there really.
__________________ OzHunter Give me a six-pack and a red dirt open road (Adam Brand) |
| | |
| | #23 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 218
| Quote:
Used to have aBRNO back in South Africa - can't go wrong. | |
| | |