| | #41 |
| Member Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 26
| I just picked up a nice savage 340e in .222 it has an old tasco 3-9 for $317 after taxes. The gun is in excellent condition overall great shooter. I havent shot alot of rounds yet but got a nice 1.5 inch group at 100 yards. So i thought it was a baragin |
| | |
| | #42 | |
| Senior Member | Quote:
I use .204 Thompson Encore and a .22-250 Remington Model 700 for the most part on gophers 200+ yards out (both with bipods). When I'm really looking for a challenge, I use .223 rounds from my mini-14 or Stag M4. You're going to get a lot more accuracy out of a bolt than a semi-auto. When you're talking about targets the size of gophers, that accuracy is a must. Besides, you'll have plenty of time between shots to cycle a bolt action since they all disappear for awhile after you take a shot. You'll save $$$ on ammo too, since you won't be so apt to go all rambo on them with a semi-auto and miss a majority of shots.
__________________ When they come for my guns, I'll give 'em the bullets first! | |
| | |
| | #43 |
| Senior Member ![]() Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 5,087
| There is no platform more accurate today to fire from than the AR today.Other autoloaders are doing fine also today.A .17hmr,being a slower bullet than a .223or .22-250 has more time for the wind to effect it and naturally drifts further.They will do great if the shooter knows how to handle them. sam. |
| | |
| | #44 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: oregon
Posts: 398
| I have a CZ 527 American laminate wood stock. 204 Ruger. This gun gomes with a set trigger, is very accurate and cost me 535.00. That leaves plenty for your scope. I went with a 4-16 Tasco-189.00. Vert good rig, look into it. |
| | |