| | |||||||
| Register | Blogs | FAQ | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read | Chat Room [10] |
| | Thread Tools |
| | #21 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Jun 2008 Location: Republic of the US
Posts: 121
| Quote:
Yep. Same as I. Missile Tech.
__________________ It is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong. ~Voltaire | |
| | |
| | #22 | |
| Senior Member Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: COBRA COMMAND HEADQUARTERS
Posts: 1,631
| Quote:
Last edited by Taurus Fan; 10-16-2009 at 09:36 AM. | |
| | |
| | #23 |
| Senior Member ![]() Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: Minn.
Posts: 2,617
|
When I was in AIT(advanced individual training) I was going to go to pick up my wife from the bus station ON BASE and my DI made me iron my khaki uniform and polish my brass even though it was spotless took an extra hour just to leave the area and this was all on base.
|
| | |
| | #24 |
| Senior Member ![]() Join Date: Mar 2002 Location: Tallahassee, Florida
Posts: 14,092
|
During my first hitch, I was in the USAF - 1976 to 1980. When I left Chanute AFB in July of '76, we were days away from the deadline in losing our khakis. I wore them while driving home for leave before reporting to my next duty station. I liked that uniform - it looked sharp! After that, we wore our OD 'pickle suits' while working on base or the "Bus Driver" uniform of light blue shirt and dark blue pants. Of course we had the dark blue Dress Blues. It was verboten to wear the green fatigues into town. So, in late 1980, I reup, but into the USN. I liked the blue dungarees - I always did like jeans...... But we could NOT wear them in town, and even if we wore them in our car coming in to work, we could get busted (I lived off-base' the last year I was in). Only chiefs and officers had the khakis. We had the blue (actually black) wool "Cracker Jack" uniform for winter, and the white polyesther Cracker Jacks for summer (I utterly hated them!) and the summer white shirt/pants, black winter shirt/pants, and intermediate white shirt/black pants uniform - whew! So many variations, we had to read the POD (Plan Of The Day) to see what we were supposed to wear. Once in training, I dressed for tech school in the dark, and got caught at school having accidentally put on the Lee jeans instead of the Seafarer dungarees - DOH! Had to go back to barracks and dress again. So now it seems to have changed a lot! I guess the new NWU's are to look more like the other services - but the US Navy had always stuck to tradition - so I view this with sadness. My old Senior Chief used to say - "The United States Navy, 200 years of tradition unmarred by progress!" He'd roll in his grave seeing how things are now. ![]() I guess I'm just an 'old salt', stuck in the past.
__________________ "A bold spirit embiggens the smallest man!" Jebediah Springfield |
| | |
| | #25 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Massillon, Ohio
Posts: 1,246
| Its not the only thing that has changed....
The first time I was in the Army was 1986. I've bounced around over the years in different services and took a 13 year break. I'm Army national guard now and I see a whole new world. I'm in Fort Jackson, SC as I write this, attending a ten week course. The discipline, expectations, entry requirements, basically everything is different from just a few years ago. Traveling in uniform, and which uniform has changed but now it depends on what type of orders you are traveling under; PCS, TDY, ADT, etc. You can fly in ACUs if on TDY orders, I know that for sure. The others I don't know. Another issue you may come across is that 45% of our military force today is reserve and national guard. Many reserve and National guard units don't issue class A uniforms anymore. Especially now that they are switching to the blues being the official dress uniform, alot of units don't even have them to issue. (Mine for instance) The biggest thing that has irked me thus far is the lack of discipline and no one being held accountable. Drill sergeants are too restricted on what they can do, school instructors are too limited on what they can do, and the NCOs are very poorly trained and have no leadership skills. (this is not true of everyone, don't get me wrong, but its far too common... and was unheard of in the old days.) On the first day of this course I'm taking (we are in training along with new recruits) a private fresh out of basic told a Sergeant to "chill out" when he was told to get moving. I of course, being an old timer and old school, told the private if he didn't move his ass I was gonna come back there and choke him out. LoL yes i really did. That got him moving, but boy did it cause turmoil for the school. (you see, actually making people do what they are supposed to do is no longer Army policy) Repeats of similar incidents have occured basically on a daily basis since I arrived here 6 weeks ago. I'm incredibly disappointed in where the Army has gone with its discipline. Ashamed might be a better word. It will be a miracle if I leave this post without permanently injuring a private, or worse an NCO. You see its simple.. if you allow them to be poor privates and poor specialists... they will be poor NCOs. So you shouldn't expect anything different. Want an argument for not giving prisoners rights? Here it is... give new privates a bunch of rights, actually give them classes on their rights and the limitations of instructors... then you get what I see today. I guess they call this place "Relaxin Jackson" for a reason.
__________________ Resist! |
| | |
| | #26 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,461
|
I am personally a fan of wearing a Garrison Uniform "A's of B's" in Garrison and field uniforms, guess where, in the field. But that's just me, and the Army didn't consult me. I guess the only place I can put my ribbons is in the box in the drawer. TCA
__________________ Afghanistan sucks. |
| | |
| | #27 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Albuquerque
Posts: 815
|
Personaly, I think if you earned it, wear it.
__________________ The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. |
| | |
| | #28 |
| Senior Member Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Massillon, Ohio
Posts: 1,246
| Yet another rant...lol
The Army ACUs suck. They are a completely inappropriate uniform for combat or even training. They are not as durable and the idiot who came up with the idea of velcro on a battle uniform should be court martialed for being an idiot. I'm sure he had alot of brass on his collar and sat in a big chair in the pentagon. Its coming out now that the Army knew the ACUs weren't up to the task, but they went with them anyway. There was nothing wrong with the old BDUs. If they wanted to change the camo pattern, that could have easily been done without changing the entire uniform. The zipper front I like. Thats it. The velcro wears out and your pockets don't stay closed, the material is weak and tears easily, and "all weather" isn't really. They wanted velcro everything so you could "sterilize" your uniform in the event of capture, etc. Hey, guess what, that is easily remedied by NOT WEARING ALL THAT UNNECESSARY CRAP ON YOUR BATTLE UNIFORM! Unit patch, combat patch, qualification badges, etc... all totally unnecessary and only serve the purpose of bragging rights anyway. You'll notice the Marines don't worry about all of that. Keep it simple. Velcro name-tape is all that would be needed. Ok, thus endeth the rant. LoL
__________________ Resist! |
| | |
| | #29 |
| Suspected Member ![]() Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Anchortown, Alaska
Posts: 26,404
|
Though I started out in starched cotton fatigues and loved them, I also like the ACU's and am glad soldiers may wear them in their day to day doings here in town. So I can stop and thank them !!
__________________ In the absence of orders, ATTACK !! |
| | |
| | #30 | |
| Member Join Date: Nov 2009 Location: NC & Baghdad, Iraq
Posts: 47
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| Gun and Game Forums |
| Thread Tools | |
| |