Welcome to the New GunAndGame.com
Send Feedback - Back to the Old GunAndGame

Go Back   Gun and Game Forums > Firearms > Manufacturers > Winchester

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-16-2005, 12:58 PM   #1
Super Moderator
 
BattleRifleG3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Western PA
Posts: 11,401
Images: 13
Winchester 1300 Magazine Tube Question - Don't ask why...

You guys hopefully know me well enough to stop asking "WHY?" when I have some bizarre technical question most likely related to an even more bizarre idea. So here it is...

We have the Winchester 1300. Rotary bolt, aluminum alloy receiver, pump action shotgun. Available in all the expected configurations for hunting, home defense, and police use. Like the Mossberg 500 and unlike the Remington 870, it has multiple magazine tube lengths offered, and different barrels for each length. Like the Rem 870 and unlike the Moss 500, it has a cap that screws onto the open end of a magazine. So a couple ideas have appeared...

a.) Could a magazine extension be added to the extended tube version of the Win 1300? That could expand 8 rounds to 10 or more.
b.) Could a sporting barrel made for the shorter magazine be used on a version with the longer magazine, with a pipe or something as a spacer between the ring under the barrel and the magazine cap?

One selling point of the Win 1300 is that it will cycle Aguila mini shells without a problem, which could fit quite a few in an extended tube. Now that the ban is dead, imagine the capacity possibilities for a doubly extended tube magazine...

This has nothing to do with practicality. The chances of me actually doing such a crazy thing are pretty low. My only question is would it work?
Additionally, I'm looking to be able to use the same shotgun for hunting and home defense simply with a barrel change. I'm probably going to get a Remington 870, for many good reasons, but before I do I want the whole scoupe on the Winchester.

Here's what I'm talking about. Winchester has a 5 shot and 8 shot version of the 1300. Assuming the bolt lockups are interchangeable, wouldn't the tube length be the only thing keeping the barrels from being interchangeable? And wouldn't it make sense that shorter tube barrels would work with the longer tubes if a long spacer was used between the ring on the barrel and the magazine end cap?
http://www.winchesterguns.com/prodin...es/512104m.jpg
http://www.winchesterguns.com/prodin...es/512207m.jpg
http://www.winchesterguns.com/prodin...es/512042m.jpg
http://www.winchesterguns.com/prodin...es/512041m.jpg

Noticing also that Winchester makes their Defender model in 20ga, suppose the same would be possible there as well?
__________________
Trust is earned, not... GIVEN away. - Worf
BattleRifleG3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2005, 01:25 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
silentknight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Iowa
Posts: 1,125
Images: 3
I'm assuming there are going to be more barrels available for the standard 5 shot tube. These work like Remington's magazine extensions

Choate has 7-10 shot extensions
http://www.choatestocks.com/MagXt.html

Advanced Technology has 7-8 shot extensions
http://www.atigunstocks.com/SHTMAGEXT.html

I hope that this helps you (but I still think you should get the 870 :right: )
__________________
Sic Vis Pacem Parabellum
silentknight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2005, 09:33 AM   #3
Super Moderator
 
BattleRifleG3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Western PA
Posts: 11,401
Images: 13
Thanks for the links! Anyone know if I'd be right that the barrels for the short tubed models would fit the long tubed ones if a spacer was used that made up the difference in length?
__________________
Trust is earned, not... GIVEN away. - Worf
BattleRifleG3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2005, 01:07 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Central Fla.
Posts: 175
Quote:
Originally Posted by BattleRifleG3
You guys hopefully know me well enough to stop asking "WHY?" when I have some bizarre technical question most likely related to an even more bizarre idea. So here it is...

We have the Winchester 1300. Rotary bolt, aluminum alloy receiver, pump action shotgun. Available in all the expected configurations for hunting, home defense, and police use. Like the Mossberg 500 and unlike the Remington 870, it has multiple magazine tube lengths offered, and different barrels for each length. Like the Rem 870 and unlike the Moss 500, it has a cap that screws onto the open end of a magazine. So a couple ideas have appeared...

a.) Could a magazine extension be added to the extended tube version of the Win 1300? That could expand 8 rounds to 10 or more.
b.) Could a sporting barrel made for the shorter magazine be used on a version with the longer magazine, with a pipe or something as a spacer between the ring under the barrel and the magazine cap?

One selling point of the Win 1300 is that it will cycle Aguila mini shells without a problem, which could fit quite a few in an extended tube. Now that the ban is dead, imagine the capacity possibilities for a doubly extended tube magazine...

This has nothing to do with practicality. The chances of me actually doing such a crazy thing are pretty low. My only question is would it work?
Additionally, I'm looking to be able to use the same shotgun for hunting and home defense simply with a barrel change. I'm probably going to get a Remington 870, for many good reasons, but before I do I want the whole scoupe on the Winchester.

Here's what I'm talking about. Winchester has a 5 shot and 8 shot version of the 1300. Assuming the bolt lockups are interchangeable, wouldn't the tube length be the only thing keeping the barrels from being interchangeable? And wouldn't it make sense that shorter tube barrels would work with the longer tubes if a long spacer was used between the ring on the barrel and the magazine end cap?
http://www.winchesterguns.com/prodin...es/512104m.jpg
http://www.winchesterguns.com/prodin...es/512207m.jpg
http://www.winchesterguns.com/prodin...es/512042m.jpg
http://www.winchesterguns.com/prodin...es/512041m.jpg

Noticing also that Winchester makes their Defender model in 20ga, suppose the same would be possible there as well?

You said in part."........to an even more bizarre idea." Looks like you want something that holds 100 rounds of fire power, weights under 6 lbs, can operate under water, floats when released(in water), can be used as a flair gun, serves as a putter if needed, when taken apart,can be re-assembled as a
Mini-Cooper car, and best of all it`s invisible. Now that`s bizarre.
I`m just having a little fun with your "bizarre" idea. Not ment to ruffle any feathers. Life is good

" The best part of the hunt is not the harvest but in the experience."
Sav .250 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2005, 09:56 AM   #5
Senior Member
 
Otter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Vermont
Posts: 952
Images: 6
The barrels will interchange with a spacer, at least with my model 1200 defender they would, I don't think the short shells will feed, I loved my 1200 defender, it was great, I especially liked being able to load and unload it while in the lock mound without cycling the slide.
__________________
Life is too important to be taken seriously.
Otter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2005, 12:53 PM   #6
Super Moderator
 
BattleRifleG3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Western PA
Posts: 11,401
Images: 13
I've read that the Win 1300 is the only shotgun that will feed the short shells without difficulty. Any confirmation on this?
__________________
Trust is earned, not... GIVEN away. - Worf
BattleRifleG3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2005, 01:25 PM   #7
Logansdad
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by BattleRifleG3
I've read that the Win 1300 is the only shotgun that will feed the short shells without difficulty. Any confirmation on this?
my Remington doesn't like them...never had a problem with the Winchester..what's up with that ?
  Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
winchester, 1300, magazine, tube, question, ask

Thread Tools

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:16 PM.


[Output: 68.35 Kb. compressed to 64.53 Kb. by saving 3.83 Kb. (5.60%)]