Asymmetrical Warfare: What the Government and Lapdog Authoritarians Would Like You to Forget About

Discussion in 'Off The Reservation' started by ammodotcom, Aug 7, 2020.

  1. ammodotcom

    ammodotcom G&G Evangelist

    Unlike Europe, the United States has a homegrown militia movement that is heavily armed and, to varying degrees, ready for battle. When the AR-15 is talked about as a “weapon of war on our streets,” it is frequently mentioned in the same breath how an insurrection in the United States would never stand a chance against the modern weapons of war wielded by the federal government. This would be news to the Viet Cong. People who make such statements are unaware of the dynamics of [asymmetrical warfare].

    Anyone who feels frightened by a future they can't fight back against need only remember: The government isn't stupid, which is why they're still a lot more afraid of you than you should be of them. Our own Sam Jacobs' article Asymmetrical Warfare and 4GW: How Militia Groups are America's Domestic Viet Cong serves as a brilliant reminder of this.
     
    TXplt, Merle, blaster and 3 others like this.
  2. Dragunov

    Dragunov G&G Evangelist

    As someone who's trained soldiers in Asymmetrical Warfare, I'll train civilians also, if it comes down to it. The .gov actually DOES fear us. They'd better, because a man (woman) who uses Asymmetrical tactics, are down to their "nothing to lose" mentality, and have no fear.

    One of the most appropriate movie lines ever:

    "Even the tiniest flea, will drive the biggest dog, nuts."
    <Red Dawn-2012>

    Es wurden keine wahreren Worte gesprochen nicht.
     
    Last edited: Aug 7, 2020
    Stickman, TXplt, ammodotcom and 5 others like this.

  3. Jaison

    Jaison G&G Evangelist Forum Contributor

    Absolut korrect
     
    TXplt, ammodotcom, Merle and 3 others like this.
  4. Huey Rider

    Huey Rider G&G Evangelist Forum Contributor

    Do not fear the night,
    Fear what’s in the night.......
    I am in the night.
     
    jwrauch, TXplt, austinjoe13 and 6 others like this.
  5. Jaison

    Jaison G&G Evangelist Forum Contributor

    We are the storm and what goes bump in the night.
     
    blue fox, jwrauch, TXplt and 4 others like this.
  6. Thanks for the Post, Definitely a well thought out read!
     
    Cyrano, TXplt, ammodotcom and 2 others like this.
  7. neophyte

    neophyte Wonderment :) Forum Contributor

    information: I give no credence to Kissinger. (Vietnam)
    He happens the policy maker.

    https://study.com/academy/lesson/asymmetric-warfare-definition-tactics-examples.html

    Asymmetric Warfare
    Famed policymaker and diplomat Henry Kissinger once commented that ''the guerilla wins if he does not lose. The conventional army loses if it does not win.'' What Kissinger observed was that armies with different sizes and resources can fight in different ways. This has been true throughout human history, but since the mid-20th century we've developed a name for this: asymmetric warfare. Something that is asymmetrical is uneven, unequal, or imbalanced. Asymmetric warfare exists when the two main armies are of unequal size or strength. It's a different way to wage war, when the sides of the conflict don't look the same.

    Tactics
    In a traditional war, you have two professional armies who have roughly the same experience, resources, and technologies. The only real difference is how they execute their strategies. We call that symmetrical warfare, because both sides essentially look the same. For example, when the Allies fought the Axis, it was a conflict between professional, national armies that were all basically the same.

    That's how we expect war to be fought. But what happens if one of the combatants is not a professional army, but a smaller group of insurgents or rebels? The traditional military tactics used to fight a professional army may no longer work. Asymmetrical warfare is most often fought using guerilla tactics, which are aimed at harassing the enemy more than trying to obliterate them.
     
    TXplt, Merle, Jaison and 1 other person like this.
  8. ammodotcom

    ammodotcom G&G Evangelist

    I'm glad we've got people like you at the ready. I just pray for your sanity if you ever have to train idiots like myself to do something actually productive.
     
    Huey Rider, Dragunov, blaster and 3 others like this.
  9. Jim Bridger

    Jim Bridger G&G Evangelist Forum Contributor

    The Japanese considered attacking the American Homeland?
    blade of grass.png But reconsidered wisely.:usa2:
     
    blaster, TXplt, jwrauch and 1 other person like this.
  10. Big Dog

    Big Dog Retired IT Dinosaur Wrangler Forum Contributor

    A lot of us are too old and broken down to take an active frontline role in the coming action, but we can certainly offer support..... meals, shelter, ammo handloading, simple weapon repair/servicing, etc. In any army, every fighter is backed up by many support folks!
     
    Jaison, Huey Rider, blaster and 4 others like this.
  11. Jim Bridger

    Jim Bridger G&G Evangelist Forum Contributor

    Badly wounded Marines lay dying in the jungle. They often found a deadly granade or one more round in their M-16.:usa2:
     
    blaster, TXplt, jwrauch and 1 other person like this.
  12. Ranger4

    Ranger4 G&G Evangelist


    You are so correct. When a special operations force of 10 men deploy Mideast from a base in the US, there will be 90 more who have moved before to provide transport, a forward base with quarters and food and munitions and toilet paper, medics, aircraft support, commo support and a few others will be in a forward area to support the 10 who may hit the ground and be in and out before first light.

    There is always a need for old codgers to support the front line forces. There is also a great deal of efficiency or corporate knowledge by the older and experienced folks who may load the ammo, prepare the meals, load the packs, and assist in the planning for the mobile few.

    As for me, I would be honored to end my tour of this life as support staff in honor of the many who supported me in times before. As said in the Bible it is called the parable of the talents, Matthew 25:15, we help according to our ability at the time. So, I agree totally that we may have a role to play should that need come. IMHO
     
    Huey Rider, blaster, TXplt and 2 others like this.
  13. animalspooker

    animalspooker G&G Evangelist

    Just curious Dragunov? What is your 'job' that you teach this? Are you military? Does the military teach this type of warfare?

    Please don't mistake my questions as doubting you or anything along those lines. I'm more exposing my lack of knowledge on this subject matter.
     
    Huey Rider, TXplt and jwrauch like this.
  14. jwrauch

    jwrauch G&G Evangelist Forum Contributor

    At 72 I could do that and I've often considered it !!
     
  15. TXplt

    TXplt Gun Toting Boeing Driver Forum Contributor

    We just got back from the cabin to our farm. Beautiful and rugged terrain.

    Insurgents have always given any invading force fits (including US who have the finest equipment, technology, and training of anywhere in the world). Whether it would have been the US invading Japan or Japan trying to invade the US there would have been HUGE casualties. The US probably worse in that we had proficient riflemen but I can't imagine the casualty losses going up against indigent Japanese willing to do anything for their homeland with any tool they might find--and believing that was the directive from their 'god.' Good thing for the US that the atomic bombs worked in causing Japan to surrender. It would have been very hard (even though MacArthur wanted it--which I can't fathom with todays' eyes or any rational war fighting training) and nasty fight would the US had to invade.

    I can't imagine a tyranny facing the combination of this terrain we have in the part of the world I'm currently in (western and central PA) with well trained proficient riflemen who didn't want them there. For heavens sake most of these folks have been deer hunting getting up at a God-Awful hour sitting in woods and trees in horrible weather most of their life to get one shot at a game animal. So there's no way an invading Federal (or state or otherwise) force could take or hold the ground. Problem though is communism works from within and often suckers in people who don't realize what's going on until they're in the middle of it. I mean look at the abhorrent irrational behavior caused by the WuFlu and the slowness in understanding the political nature of what's going on (create faceless people--by mandate--kind of like a form of twilight zone droid--scared to hold each other, shake hands, hug, gather, see facial expressions, or greet each other while destroying capital markets, nationalizing huge segments of the economy, and telling people where they can go, whether or not they can worship, get together for concerts and joyful activities, whether or not they can sell, whether or not they can go to gyms or taverns -- this is nuts and communism ! Since when have we given away this authority over basic rights and our lives ?!?).

    So even a seemingly rational people can get suckered in.

    But organization is always a problem. And some people actually can get suckered into the propaganda (whether it's the WuFlu or communist protests although at this point they're all kind of a part of the same political control agenda).
     
    Last edited: Aug 8, 2020
    jwrauch and blaster like this.
  16. Dragunov

    Dragunov G&G Evangelist

    You'd be surprised at how much patience I actually have.
     
    Last edited: Aug 8, 2020
  17. runfiverun

    runfiverun G&G Evangelist

    Macarthur wanted to go land based so he could drop the Philippines' in on the Japanese.
    the aftermath of that retaliation would have been more horrific than the bomb.
     
  18. blue fox

    blue fox G&G Evangelist

    Some things that need to be remembered here. The US military has fallen victim to the sam style of thinking the Brits had during the Revolution. They fought (or tried to) as large military group formations. The American military (at that time) fought using tactics they learned from the Indians. Our military has forgotten that lesson and was reminded of it in Vietnam. However they obviously have forgotten again as evidenced by the mess in the sandbox. Many of us here are students of history. This puts us in the position of remembering how guerrilla warfare works. We would be able to put that knowledge to good use.
     
    jwrauch, blaster, Huey Rider and 3 others like this.
  19. chesterwin

    chesterwin G&G Evangelist

    Tobacco sticks as toys. Maybe a couple others might understand.
     
    blue fox and jwrauch like this.
  20. runfiverun

    runfiverun G&G Evangelist

    the military didn't forget.
    they just have to follow orders and ROE's that stop them from actually fighting.

    if you gave most of those units some dirt to draw on, a stick, and general Pershing's ROE's things would be a lot different real quick....