Gun and Game Forum banner

1 - 6 of 6 Posts

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
7,251 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Clinton talked about gangs and drugs as a cause of homicides, but mentioned guns only in passing. She noted â??a direct correlation between the illegal gun sales and homicides,â?? as she proposed a new initiative to crack down on interstate gun trafficking and allow federal agencies to share information on the transfer of guns. In addition, Clinton said she would work to renew the assault-weapons ban, signed by President Clinton in 1994 but allowed to lapse a decade later.

More...
 

·
Premium Member
Joined
·
18,914 Posts
Not just renew, but beef it up and make it even harder on legal gun owners. The woman has a blown head gasket. No mention of cracking down on criminals, was there?
 

·
Resident Curmudgeon
Joined
·
34,495 Posts
Slick Hillary, like all antigun nanny-staters (see also "fascists") thinks she knows better than We the People concerning how to prevent crime and protect the citizenry. And like all antigunners, she is congenitally incapable of accepting the FBI statistics that prove wherever citizens have the right to carry concealed and the right to keep firearms in a ready-use state in their homes, crime goes down across the board. She and her evil minions must be stopped before our freedoms are legislated away. History shows that once a freedom is taken, restoring it is difficult to impossible. Her grandiose schemes must be stopped now, while they are still only schemes. Do everything you can to defeat her, both as a presidential candidate and a senatorial legislator.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
6,918 Posts
That woman is a rabid anti-gunner and quicker to lie than speak the truth. She would probably make a worse President than her husband. She would outlaw a many guns as she could.
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
668 Posts
Cyrano,
your so right! Like all ultra liberal nanny-staters they are against guns because in their eyes NONE of us can be trusted. We are also too stupid to think for ourselves, that's why we need the government to take care of us. Got a problem, we've got a program.
That's what those elitist so and so's think of us. Without their parental guidance we are all just lost children aimlessly wondering helplessly waiting for Hilarious Clinton or Barak Obomination to take us by the hand. Gee, do I sound bitter?
 

·
Registered
Joined
·
899 Posts
Well the 20,000+ laws on the books restricting gun ownership sure do put a dent in crime dont they ? Heck a few more would be an improvement I am sure.

Sacasm off.

Philadelphia is one of the most violent and crime ridden cities in America. Without looking it up I am willing to bet that most of those murders were drug and gang related. Why would anyone in their right mind think that a criminal will pay heed to another anti-gun law ?

Let the scumbag gangbangers and drug dealers kill each other, it only saves us the trouble of dealing with so many of them. Hell build a wall around the projects, make sure everyone has a gun and ammo. When the dust settles go in and finish off whatever is left. I cant think of an easier way to rid the world of filth such as that. ( a utopian view perhaps)It sure would do good for the gene pool.

If everyone carried guns the country would be a safer place, and those who forgot what it is to be polite, would learn quickly what it means.
 
1 - 6 of 6 Posts
Top