close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Gay California teachers 'come out' in classroom

Discussion in 'The Powder Keg' started by Doglips, May 28, 2002.

  1. Doglips

    Doglips G&G Newbie

    Gay California teachers 'come out' in classroom
    By Ellen Sorokin
    THE WASHINGTON TIMES


    A California public school district is allowing homosexual school employees to "come out" in front of children in school without obtaining parents' permission. Top Stories
    • 'A sacrifice we'll make'
    • Musharraf address riles India
    • Overbilled drivers to get cash back
    • Scenario of nuke strikes weighed
    • Suspects get a cut of U.N. law fees
    • Captain of tugboat 'blacked out'
    • Feminists lobby for U.N. rights pact


    A unanimous resolution allows teachers at the Hayward Unified School District to talk openly about homosexuality or to discuss their homosexual lifestyles with students during class. The district's school board says such action is required under the California Student Safety and Violence Prevention Act of 2000.
    Teachers also are allowed to include homosexual figures or role models in class and to read books with homosexual characters such as "Heather Has Two Mommies."
    The case in Hayward is part of a growing national trend in how school districts deal with homosexuality.
    Scott Lively, president of the Pro-Family Law Center in Citrus Heights, Calif., said yesterday that his organization has received calls from concerned parents in Massachusetts, Vermont, Missouri and other towns in California during the past several months.
    "It's a national campaign that is being pushed by homosexual activists, and that campaign is to homosexualize the public-school environment," Mr. Lively said. "One of the goals is to create a voting majority within the high school students who would be in favor of gay perspectives. These are activists who got in positions of authority and use it to advance a selfish social agenda, and, frankly, that's evil."
    School district officials said yesterday that the resolution is about training students and teachers about tolerance and how to provide a safe learning environment for homosexual students and teachers. It's not about teaching students about homosexuality, said Kim Hammond, the school district's chief administrative officer.
    "We're not saying, 'Let's teach the students about homosexuality,'" Ms. Hammond said. "What we're saying is, 'How do we accept individuals who are different from ourselves?' Our school board is committed to maintaining a safe learning environment for all of our students."
    But critics, including the Pacific Justice Institute, argue that the resolution overrides parental rights by not requiring the district's schools or teachers to give notice to parents or allow parents a chance to opt their children out of the instruction.
    "This gives teachers a blank check to flaunt homosexuality to students, and that is totally crossing the line in public education," said Brad Dacus, the institute's president. "This is aggressive promoting of changing the attitudes of children about homosexuality. The goal here is not to promote school safety. The goal is to promote a social agenda."
    The institute sent a letter to Hayward school officials demanding that the policy be rescinded. "We won't do that because this is the law and we're complying with it," Ms. Hammond said.
    Ralph Stern, an attorney for the school system, said in a letter to the institute that its reading of the resolution is "incorrect." "It is incorrect when you state that this resolution authorizes teachers to freely discuss personal sexual issues," Mr. Stern wrote. "We do agree that this legislation does not require school districts to adopt a particular curriculum. Adoption of the resolution does constitute adoption of a curriculum."
    The law states that school districts in California should develop specific training procedures to protect students and staff from harassment or violence. The training must focus on strategies for handling harassment, responding to biased behavior, dealing with name-calling and creating a safe learning environment.
    Hayward schools approved the resolution after hearing testimony from local homosexual activists that homosexual students face severe isolation and fear when they come out. According to a 2001 national survey, 83 percent of homosexual students reported being verbally harassed because of their sexual orientation, and 21 percent reported being physically assaulted.
    The resolution specifically states that each school should develop "procedures that insure that gay youth and staff can come out without fear of reprisal or harassment." It also states that "existing curriculum be reviewed, expanded and improved to ensure teachers can provide positive images of gay people in the classroom and discuss alternative family configurations; and infuse relevant homosexual curriculum across disciplines."
    Parents whose children attend Hayward schools said no one should be subjected to harassment or violence, but they don't want their parental rights to be taken away in the meantime.
    "I refuse to allow my responsibility as a parent to be violated by covertly dismantling parental authorization required when sensitive family and sex-education issues are addressed as stated in the education code," said one parent who did not want to be identified. "District board members have failed to honor parental discretion and the law."
     
  2. NRAJOE

    NRAJOE YOU TALKIN' TO ME!? Forum Contributor

    ISN'T THAT SPECIAL? WHEN EXACTLY IS KALIFORNICATION SUPPOSED TO BREAK OFF AND FALL INTO THE OCEAN? I'VE BEEN WAITING FOREVER! :uzi:
     
    Last edited: May 28, 2002

  3. Logansdad

    Logansdad Guest

    a classic example of what an organized vocal minority can acomplish as compared to a complacent silent majority. These liberal democrats vote and are members of act up and all that...do y'all vote or are you even a member of the NRA ?.
     
  4. NRAJOE

    NRAJOE YOU TALKIN' TO ME!? Forum Contributor

    WOULDN'T CALL MYSELF NRAJOE IF'N I WASN'T A LIFE MEMBER. EVERYONE WHO BELONGS TO THIS FORUM SHOULD BE AT LEAST AN ANNUAL MEMBER, IF NOT SHAME ON YOU!!! AND VOTE, VOTE, VOTE!!! :right:
     
  5. Oxford

    Oxford G&G Evangelist

    Totally "inappropriate"

    Can't imagine any benefit to students to learn about anyone's sexual preferance. Furthermore, to encourage these discussions in the classroom is disgusting and it makes me even more anti-California education.

    Now I wonder if there's an equal share of Republicans and Democrats in that (homo/gay) category, too. I doubt if this follows party lines, though.

    :fuss:
     
  6. Calvin

    Calvin G&G Newbie

    You know, this makes perfect sense. Teach a kid that it's okay to live an alternative lifestyle. Teach them that they can file a lawsuit if another kid does something that offends them. And, teach them that the teachers are better educators than their own parents, as the teachers know more. Kids are taught guns are bad, but the kids who shoot up schools are just a victim because the guns jumped in their hands and took over their minds. Parents who have a gun in the house are the scourge of the planet for wanting to defend their families against some poor bad guy who had it bad as a kid, and has no sense of right and wrong. Religion is a taboo subject, and God should be supressed because it agitates others who worship their own god outside the Christian faith.
    Personally, I wish California politicians and lawmakers would be put on the "America's Top Ten Most Wanted" list. They are a group of incompetent idiots and hypocrites.