H110 vs W296

Discussion in 'The Powder Keg' started by SwedeSteve, May 11, 2010.

  1. SwedeSteve

    SwedeSteve Freedom Zealot Forum Contributor

    Messages:
    33,734
    Likes Received:
    15
    Location:
    Anchortown, Alaska
    Are they really the same ?? And only vary by their own lot #'s ??


     
  2. Dakoma

    Dakoma G&G Enthusiast

    Messages:
    1,469
    Likes Received:
    7
    Location:
    Southeast Tennessee
    It is what I read in Handloader Magazine,have not used W296 but have used H110.
     
  3. Pumpkinheaver

    Pumpkinheaver G&G Evangelist

    Messages:
    3,008
    Likes Received:
    78
    Location:
    Missouri
    Every manual I have shows the same charge weights for these 2 powders. I have read in handloader magazine that they are ther same.
     
  4. DocAitch

    DocAitch G&G Enthusiast

    Messages:
    946
    Likes Received:
    62
    Location:
    North of Baltimore
    Yes.Since Hodgdon began distributing Winchester powders, the data for these powders are exactly the same.
    DocAitch
     
  5. rondog

    rondog G&G Evangelist

    Messages:
    8,148
    Likes Received:
    719
    Location:
    Commurado, USA
    Yep, same stuff. Not even made by Hodgdon either, can't recall the name, St. Mark's Powder Co. or something like that. Probably made in the same machine, and pooped out of two different spouts into 296 jugs on one side and 110 jugs on the other side. Same story with Win 231 and HP38.
     
  6. deadzero

    deadzero G&G Evangelist Forum Contributor

    Messages:
    4,022
    Likes Received:
    518
    Location:
    deep in the swamps SC
    I dunno.

    i've used both in my 357 security six and the Win. 296 throws a big fireball out the end of the barrel (very accurate even so), the H110 feels about the same but no fireball.

    :scratchchin:
     
  7. Huey Rider

    Huey Rider Rotorhead Savage Forum Contributor

    Messages:
    11,687
    Likes Received:
    2,980
    Location:
    Great Lakes Region
    Yup,same powder,same load data.
     
  8. SwedeSteve

    SwedeSteve Freedom Zealot Forum Contributor

    Messages:
    33,734
    Likes Received:
    15
    Location:
    Anchortown, Alaska
    Can you just back down 10% from max in either to establish an accurate load ??
     
  9. BORIS

    BORIS Suspended

    Messages:
    882
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    In the GAP

    Same for the old Winchester 571 and HS7 too. I used to make some smokin hot 9mm loads with 571. After they stopped selling the 571 I read HS7 was the same. I was soooo happy to have one of my favorite 9mm major powders back.......
     
  10. dogknott

    dogknott G&G Newbie

    Messages:
    25
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    IOWA
    I use the H110/296 in my 410 loads, have even mixed it. Rumer has it, they are dropping the 296, as they did the 571.

    DuPont(IMR) is going to do the same with some othere powders,soon.
     
  11. samuel

    samuel G&G Newbie

    Messages:
    15,238
    Likes Received:
    11
    Yes,back it down 10% and go for accuracy.Best of luck Steve.Yes,they are the same. ,,,sam.
     
  12. dogknott

    dogknott G&G Newbie

    Messages:
    25
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    IOWA
    HMMM.......... Just read where Hogdon bought IMR in 2003, no wonder they have grown so much as of late.
     
  13. samuel

    samuel G&G Newbie

    Messages:
    15,238
    Likes Received:
    11
    They also have marketing rights on Winchester.Thats why all three powders are togather on their load site. ,,,sam.
     
  14. dmazur

    dmazur G&G Newbie

    Messages:
    55
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Pacific NW
    From the Hodgdon manual -

    There are still reports of overpressure "spikes" with light loads of these powders (which have been noted as identical) and the experts are still studying the phenomenon.

    So, for a 24gr charge, the lowest recommended would be 23.3gr, not 21.6gr.
     
  15. Tracer

    Tracer G&G Aussie Dad Forum Contributor

    Messages:
    9,556
    Likes Received:
    835
    Location:
    LHC AZ.
    Iv'e learnt sumthin today. thanks guys, just saved me buying some 296!
     
Verification:
Draft saved Draft deleted