close

Privacy guaranteed - Your email is not shared with anyone.

Has anybody seen info on this "RIP" ammunition before?

Discussion in 'The Powder Keg' started by Jay, Jan 22, 2014.

  1. Jay

    Jay Old man, No tact... Staff Member Forum Contributor

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2002
    Messages:
    11,607
    Likes Received:
    4,008
    On first glance, it appears to be a pretty effective bullet. I think it may be worth keeping an eye on.

    G2R RIP 2014 - YouTube


     
    #1
    Last edited: Jan 22, 2014
  2. TNPIRATE

    TNPIRATE Landlubber Pirate Forum Contributor

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2011
    Messages:
    14,593
    Likes Received:
    4,728
    That'll leave a mark for surelol

    :swordfight:
     
    #2
  3. Brother Bob

    Brother Bob G&G Evangelist Forum Contributor

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2007
    Messages:
    13,420
    Likes Received:
    1,026
    Looks like one round would really be enough to cause massive trauma to whatever it hits. Getting shot in the foot with this round could be lethal. Scary.
     
    #3
  4. TXplt

    TXplt Gun Toting Boeing Driver Forum Contributor

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2008
    Messages:
    14,074
    Likes Received:
    7,344
    Looks interesting but there are some disturbing marketing comments--like the "saw" one. Bullets with points never really saw through anything due to rotation because their turn rate would never allow this (by the time they complete one revolution or so they are already at their max penetration depth).

    I've been burned by some forms of DRT/Tungesten/Magtech/Glazer, etc. which ended up having unpredictable performance at the end of the day.

    Might be worth looking into for the lighter calibers--the validation to me would be performance after the FBI test batteries of barriers then penetration. If it did well in the test protocols then I'd consider giving it a try. Hornady seems to have gotten it right through most of this; their boolits did well on the FBI stuff and folks who have subsequently tested them both formally and informally have observed good performance--as have the bonded/gold dot/unicore and latter generation HST.

    For the larger calibers I like heavier boolits. 40s somewhere in between but not ready to give up my critical duty yet.

    Thanks for the post !
     
    #4
  5. swedesrus

    swedesrus G&G Evangelist

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2011
    Messages:
    4,360
    Likes Received:
    827
    Looks like over kill to me !............
     
    #5
  6. Jay

    Jay Old man, No tact... Staff Member Forum Contributor

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2002
    Messages:
    11,607
    Likes Received:
    4,008
    JJ, I wondered about the "saw" reference as well......methinks it may be marketing-related.... :dunno:

    I don't see me trading in my Hydro-Shok's for the RIP ammo, any time soon.
     
    #6
  7. FortyXDM

    FortyXDM Super Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2008
    Messages:
    10,019
    Likes Received:
    1,360
    Agreed. For now I will stay with Speer Gold Dot for HD. But it will be interesting to see further testing. Looks like a it is nasty on balloons full of water. :)
     
    #7
  8. mauser9

    mauser9 G&G Evangelist

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2011
    Messages:
    3,033
    Likes Received:
    746
    Holy Cr**. Sounds like the Black Talon debacle from years back. Am sure some lawyers will be all over this one soon.
     
    #8
  9. Twitch2120

    Twitch2120 G&G Evangelist

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2009
    Messages:
    2,924
    Likes Received:
    186
    using their data fired from a Glock 17 that bullet is turning at 92,560 RPM. unsure how to calculate that over a given distance for the saw effect but it seems plausible.
     
    #9
  10. Tracer

    Tracer G&G Aussie Dad

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2008
    Messages:
    9,682
    Likes Received:
    985
    Kinda hyped up video,like an infomercial.I'd like to see TNoutdoors do a test on you tube .
     
    #10
  11. TXplt

    TXplt Gun Toting Boeing Driver Forum Contributor

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2008
    Messages:
    14,074
    Likes Received:
    7,344
    It's also moving at 1100-1300 feet per second.

    A real quick way to do it is look at the twist rate of the barrel. The smaller glocks are around a 1 in 9. This means in 14 inches of penetration/gel the bullet would have gone around 1.5 times. I don't think their .45 would even have gone around once in this distance.

    Most saws I use need significantly more sawing than twice.
     
    #11
  12. Twitch2120

    Twitch2120 G&G Evangelist

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2009
    Messages:
    2,924
    Likes Received:
    186
    making me do math. yuck. the projectile slows considerably when hitting barriers or entering gel.

    assuming a their 45 hits 1000 FPS then its turning at 45000 RPM
     
    #12
  13. Jay

    Jay Old man, No tact... Staff Member Forum Contributor

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2002
    Messages:
    11,607
    Likes Received:
    4,008
    True, but I'd guess that pressed against your skin, even a half-turn of the projectile by hand could cause a fair amount of tissue damage.... and traveling at likely 900 fps+, that damage would easily occur internally. :dunno:

    Not pro, or con... just sayin'
     
    #13
  14. KALASHNIKOV74

    KALASHNIKOV74 Suspended

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2013
    Messages:
    95
    Likes Received:
    1
    Buy it

    Get it while you can!
     
    #14
  15. jmp8927

    jmp8927 G&G Evangelist

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2007
    Messages:
    6,516
    Likes Received:
    183
    Looks very interesting. Also looks legally liable.
     
    #15
  16. mauser9

    mauser9 G&G Evangelist

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2011
    Messages:
    3,033
    Likes Received:
    746
    Surgeons will have a chore pickin those pieces out. Yeah could be an issue.
     
    #16
  17. Palladin8

    Palladin8 G&G Evangelist

    Joined:
    Nov 26, 2007
    Messages:
    8,191
    Likes Received:
    1,286
    Bullet RPM = MV X 720/Twist Rate (in inches)

    or

    MV x (12/twist rate in inches) x 60 = Bullet RPM

    so a bullet traveling 1300fps from a 1:9" twist would turn approx. 104,000 times per minute or approx. 1733.3 times per second.

    Edit:

    With a bullet starting out at 98gr and losing a large portion in a short distance I wonder how well the actual terminal performance is. The remaining slug probably only weighs 40 to 50grs. So the base of the bullet would act as a solid. It may or may not track straight and penetrate to vital organs either.

    I think it's an interesting concept but I would really like to see actual third party testing before I would entertain the thought.
     
    #17
    Last edited: Jan 22, 2014
  18. Jay

    Jay Old man, No tact... Staff Member Forum Contributor

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2002
    Messages:
    11,607
    Likes Received:
    4,008
    ...from a 1:9 twist barel, that bullet will make 1 revolution in 9" of travel, regardless of the time element. If one uses body thickness of 12", then that round will make approx 1 and 1/3 revolutions before it exits the body. That being said, as I see it, if the bullet fragments as depicted, it will fragment long before a complete revolution occurs, and the "saw" effect wouldn't contribute much.....
     
    #18
  19. surgicaltech

    surgicaltech G&G Enthusiast

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2010
    Messages:
    522
    Likes Received:
    30
    Aint that the truth.
     
    #19
  20. Never_Evil

    Never_Evil G&G Evangelist

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2009
    Messages:
    1,818
    Likes Received:
    26
    Very interesting concept. However it does not look like surgeons will have to pick out the pieces on a shredded body. Imagine an officer needing to place three shots body mass, if just one shot will tear a body up, 3 will gut and filet. There will be no need for a surgeon, just a mortician with modeling clay and make up.
     
    #20
Verification:
Draft saved Draft deleted