Gun and Game Forum banner
1 - 1 of 1 Posts

· Premium Member
Joined
·
1,087 Posts
From owning both I can say the Garand is superior by far to the Johnson. There are many thing the Johnson has that are a problem like the two screws that hold the butt stock to the rifle. IN war conditions this would break in a matter of time. The rotary drum is a pain to load all the time and is slower to load than a Garand. There are a few who will argue but if they shoot the two and realistic think about war condiition's the Garand is a better rifle. The Johnson has a long tail like rear sight that with a good hit would put it out of wack easily. Theres more but this should be enough in my eyes. The Johsnon may shoot better but so did the 03 and it was dusted by the Garand for better features, one also being the sight. Rick B
 
1 - 1 of 1 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top