Democrats have two candidates both of which are elitist liberals.
Neither candidate has chosen a running mate. So, it is a matter
of which candidate is less offensive to the typical American voter.
You can truly have two losers.
Obama is turning into his own worst enemy. Nothing like turning off
rural and religious voters by the millions.
Hillary has Bill hung around her neck just like the perverbial albatross
Be interesting if these state primary ballots had a line on them saying, "None of the above," with their delegate votes not going to any candidate if NOTA took a majority of the votes. After a few primaries with None of the Above 'winning,' perhaps a party might take the hint and find someone more acceptable to the electorate to run for office. Who knows? We might even get a candidate worth voting for!
Both parties would fight that as it would give We the people too much power and force them to put up a candidate we actually approved of. That's like trying to get Congress to pass two term limits on all elected offices. It would give the people too much power and force the professional politicians with their long running agenda out of office.
A forum community dedicated to hunters and enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about optics, trails, clubs, gunsmithing, styles, reviews, accessories, classifieds, and more. The friendliest gun forum on the Internet!