OK, now your just trolling.and has been used in actual battles, and has been on the winning side of more wars than nearly any firearm in history since the Lee-Enfield. And the other system is one that would probably break or bend upon the first blunt force use, the spear costs extra, it makes tiny holes, has never been used in a battle, and it's military equivalent has only been on the winning side in two of the last 30 or so wars it has been involved with.
or you just actually think the SKS is better than the AR pattern.
either way, get on with it, ok, its apparent you love the SKS, then just choose that and be happy with it, but your wasting your breath, or keystrokes rather, trying to convince the world your right.
a Russian interim, intermediate rifle, that was replaced almost as fast as it was introduced. it was a stop-gap between the mosin and the AK. The only reason it carried on in use after that was because there was a bunch of cheap ones around and it was cheap to produce under license ( or not).