? who is Bob Ross?Why does this guy's voice and speaking manner remind me of Bob Ross?
? who is Bob Ross?Why does this guy's voice and speaking manner remind me of Bob Ross?
Is that essentially use of bullets for the .32 revolver calibers in the ACP cartridge? Because those weights are all common loadings for the .32 S&Ws and H&R group.Some expanded Hornady 85-grain .312", 90-grain .309" and 100-grain .312" XTP bullets fired at 7 yards into water jugs from the Beretta M1935 with 3.4 inch barrel with 3 grains of AutoComp in new Starline brass with Remington 1-1/2 primers at 0.955" ctg. OAL, velocity 940-970 fps, approximating .380 ACP energy. +P load NOT suitable for Keltecs or Beretta Tomcat! Fine in the WW2-era steel frame holster pistols and the Beretta 81. Three bullets left to right: 90-grain .309" diameter XTP (no knurl), two examples of expanded .312" diameter 85-grain XTP (ID by knurl, use the .312" bullet ONLY if your pistol barrel slugs larger than .310" groove diameter).
View attachment 138670 View attachment 138672
The 100-grain Hornady XTP shown in photos below fired into water jugs with 3 grains of AutoComp. Velocity 940 fps from 3.4 inch barrel and approximates .32 H&R Mag factory load performance when fired from a revolver of the same barrel length. Blew first 1/2 gallon water jug apart, penetrated through 4th jug without exiting, and denting, but not penetrating the 5th half-gallon jug behind it. While expansion is not "impressive", it was reliable, with all three Hornady bullets, being more destructive than FMJ while maintaining adequate penetration 17" of water approximating 12" of gelatin.
View attachment 138674 View attachment 138676 View attachment 138678
The .312" diameter XTP bullets in the 85 and 100-grain weights were intended for the .32 H&R Magnum. The 60-grain XTP bullet is intended for the .32 ACP, but in my experience lacks adequate penetration when driven hard enough to expand reliably. The heavier bullets expand less, but penetrate more deeply and are a good compromise.Is that essentially use of bullets for the .32 revolver calibers in the ACP cartridge? Because those weights are all common loadings for the .32 S&Ws and H&R group.
Impressive results, by the way. The little slugs seldom expand so well.
Because maybe some people are stuck with just whatever they inherited perhaps. If a 32 ACP was passed down to them and due to their personal circumstances there isn't any unbudgeted funds for upgrading to a different firearm and ammo, that 32 ACP is it, PERIOD . . . Tom, there's a plethora of people who do not even have access to a 32 or a 25 caliber handgun without giving up clothing or food, or some other necessity that I take for granted on my fairly tight fixed income even. I'm far more blessed than many others...One question continues to hang in my mind when the .32/.25 resurrection posts appear, and in particular when they end with "It is better than than nothing". If you carry and value your life and/or want to stand your ground......WHY would you not carry a more powerful cartridge than either of these. IF you carry, and if you have the choice of grabbing a .25, a .32, or a .380 of concealable size, .......then why would you opt for the smaller calibers. ???
My observation still stands 😎It puts holes in people and makes them possibly re think having holes in them.
Sent from my iPhone using Gun and Game
And as already stated it might also serve as a back up to aback up gun.Because maybe some people are stuck with just whatever they inherited perhaps. If a 32 ACP was passed down to them and due to their personal circumstances there isn't any unbudgeted funds for upgrading to a different firearm and ammo, that 32 ACP is it, PERIOD . . . Tom, there's a plethora of people who do not even have access to a 32 or a 25 caliber handgun without giving up clothing or food, or some other necessity that I take for granted on my fairly tight fixed income even. I'm far more blessed than many others...
Once you get outside the USA, many countries severely restrict what handgun calibers civilians can legally possess.One question continues to hang in my mind when the .32/.25 resurrection posts appear, and in particular when they end with "It is better than than nothing". If you carry and value your life and/or want to stand your ground......WHY would you not carry a more powerful cartridge than either of these. IF you carry, and if you have the choice of grabbing a .25, a .32, or a .380 of concealable size, .......then why would you opt for the smaller calibers. ???
Holes in your person are Never good.It puts holes in people and makes them possibly re think having holes in them.
Sent from my iPhone using Gun and Game
Please consider the fact that there are older people (in their 70s and older) that can't control, or carry a larger handgun. You can either resign them to the status of "victim" or encourage them to fight against a 200-pound malefactor with murderous intent.One question continues to hang in my mind when the .32/.25 resurrection posts appear, and in particular when they end with "It is better than nothing". If you carry and value your life and/or want to stand your ground......WHY would you not carry a more powerful cartridge than either of these. If you carry, and if you have the choice of grabbing a .25, a .32, or a .380 of concealable size, .......then why would you opt for the smaller calibers. ???