do you have ?:assult:
note its a two part answerOriginally posted by PAPA G
of that wretched device!!!
i have seen pictures of M-16's used by the Phillipine Army with holes eroded through the magwells, and the carrying handles thinned from perseration and humidity. don't know what their maintenance procedure is but something was out of wack.BattleRifleG3 said:I thought aluminum was less prone to corrosion than steel. Or maybe the aluminum corrodes due to galvanic corrosion since the steel and aluminum are mated together. One reason I'm planning to build my AR-15 on a Stainless DPMS receiver.
i agree with the AR-18 as a should have been issued, it was a better rifle than the "15/16" Stoner relized the short comings of the M-16, and designed a better weapon.Tenable said:Point taken.. but you knew what I meant. I still think the AR-18 series would be the better rifle of the 3. Pretty much an M-16 with AK-47 reliability due to the superior gas system.